Correspondence between first-trimester fasting glycaemia, and oral glucose tolerance test in gestational diabetes diagnosis
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the correspondence between first-trimester fasting glycaemia and the results of the OGTT in diagnosing gestational diabetes (GDM). Methods The medical records of all consecutive women who had undergone a diagnostic OGTT, performed according to the IADPSG, during the past year were retrospectively reviewed. All first-trimester fasting glucose values greater or equal to 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL), recommended as a diagnostic value, were also verified for each patient in this cohort. Moreover, a ROC curve and a multiple logistic-regression model were constructed to calculate the predictive capability of this cut-off value in diagnosing GDM. Results In our population of 738 eligible pregnant women, an 11.9% prevalence of GDM was revealed by OGTT. However, when the first-trimester fasting glucose value for each patient was retrospectively considered, there were a further 29 patients who should have been diagnosed as GDM cases (glycaemia ≥ 5.1 mmol/L), although their OGTT was normal. Yet, when the value of fasting glucose was considered not diagnostic, but only predictive, an AUC of 0.614 (95% CI: 0.544-0.684) and an aOR of 7.1 (95% CI: 3.8-13.1) was obtained in these patients compared with the reference group (fasting glucose < 5.1 mmol/L). Conclusion There was no complete correspondence in diagnosing GDM between the first-trimester fasting glucose value and the results of a 2-h 75-g OGTT performed early in the third trimester. However, albeit not diagnostic, a fasting glucose value greater or equal to 5.1 mmol/L may be considered a highly predictive risk factor for GDM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many scientific papers emphasize the validity of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester of pregnancy.
“Currently, there are many scientific papers emphasizing the validity of screening for GDM in the first trimester of pregnancy [6,7,8,9].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707943 · Cited by 5,563 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: A meta-analysis
Eades, C. E., Cameron, D. M., & Evans, J. M. M. (2017) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.030 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Issues with the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in early pregnancy
McIntyre, H. D., Sacks, D. A., Barbour, L. A., Feig, D. S., Catalano, P. M., Damm, P., & McElduff, A. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-1887 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Matarrelli, B., Vitacolonna, E., D’angelo, M., Pavone, G., Mattei, P. A., Liberati, M., & Celentano, C. (2013) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.766691 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Wexler, D. J., Powe, C. E., Barbour, L. A., Buchanan, T., Coustan, D. R., Corcoy, R., Damm, P., Dunne, F., Feig, D. S., Ferrara, A., et al. (2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002726 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Bhavadharini, B., Uma, R., Saravanan, P., & Mohan, V. (2016) · Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/s40842-016-0031-y · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Celentano, C., Matarrelli, B., Pavone, G., Vitacolonna, E., Mattei, P. A., Berghella, V., & Liberati, M. (2020) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2018.1500545 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Performance of early risk assessment tools to predict the later development of gestational diabetes
Kotzaeridi, G., Blätter, J., Eppel, D., Rosicky, I., Mittlböck, M., Yerlikaya‐Schatten, G., Schatten, C., Husslein, P., Eppel, W., Huhn, E. A., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.13630 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Lewandowski, K., Głuchowska, M., Garnysz, K., Horzelski, W., Grzesiak, M., & Lewiński, A. (2021) · Endokrynologia Polska · doi:10.5603/ep.a2021.0095 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Corrado, F., D’Anna, R., Cannata, M. L., Interdonato, M. L., Pintaudi, B., & Di Benedetto, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Messina (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Corrado, F.
- Venue
- Diabetes & Metabolism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 458-461
- ISSN
- 1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975902446
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, IADPSG criteria, diagnostic accuracy, predictive value, risk factors, GDM prevalence, ROC curve, logistic regression, cut-off values, missed diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Italy, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Reference Values, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Logistic Models, Diabetes, Gestational, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review