Cited by 96Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Correspondence between first-trimester fasting glycaemia, and oral glucose tolerance test in gestational diabetes diagnosis

Corrado, F., D’Anna, R., Cannata, M.L., Interdonato, M.L., Pintaudi, B., Di Benedetto, A.·2012·Diabetes & Metabolism

Abstract

Aim To evaluate the correspondence between first-trimester fasting glycaemia and the results of the OGTT in diagnosing gestational diabetes (GDM). Methods The medical records of all consecutive women who had undergone a diagnostic OGTT, performed according to the IADPSG, during the past year were retrospectively reviewed. All first-trimester fasting glucose values greater or equal to 5.1 mmol/L (92 mg/dL), recommended as a diagnostic value, were also verified for each patient in this cohort. Moreover, a ROC curve and a multiple logistic-regression model were constructed to calculate the predictive capability of this cut-off value in diagnosing GDM. Results In our population of 738 eligible pregnant women, an 11.9% prevalence of GDM was revealed by OGTT. However, when the first-trimester fasting glucose value for each patient was retrospectively considered, there were a further 29 patients who should have been diagnosed as GDM cases (glycaemia ≥ 5.1 mmol/L), although their OGTT was normal. Yet, when the value of fasting glucose was considered not diagnostic, but only predictive, an AUC of 0.614 (95% CI: 0.544-0.684) and an aOR of 7.1 (95% CI: 3.8-13.1) was obtained in these patients compared with the reference group (fasting glucose < 5.1 mmol/L). Conclusion There was no complete correspondence in diagnosing GDM between the first-trimester fasting glucose value and the results of a 2-h 75-g OGTT performed early in the third trimester. However, albeit not diagnostic, a fasting glucose value greater or equal to 5.1 mmol/L may be considered a highly predictive risk factor for GDM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabet.2012.03.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many scientific papers emphasize the validity of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester of pregnancy.

    “Currently, there are many scientific papers emphasizing the validity of screening for GDM in the first trimester of pregnancy [6,7,8,9].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corrado, F., D’Anna, R., Cannata, M. L., Interdonato, M. L., Pintaudi, B., & Di Benedetto, A.
Affiliations
University of Messina (IT)
Corresponding author
Corrado, F.
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
458-461
ISSN
1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975902446
Cited by
96
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, IADPSG criteria, diagnostic accuracy, predictive value, risk factors, GDM prevalence, ROC curve, logistic regression, cut-off values, missed diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Italy, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Reference Values, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Logistic Models, Diabetes, Gestational, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review