Cited by 75Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus—Relevance to low and middle income countries

Open access
Bhavadharini, B., Uma, R., Saravanan, P., Mohan, V.·2016·Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common metabolic complications of pregnancy. Ever since the first systematic evaluation of the oral glucose tolerance test by O'Sullivan and colleagues was carried out in 1964, there has been controversy with respect to the optimal screening and diagnostic criteria to detect GDM. The recently proposed International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for GDM has found fairly widespread acceptance, but it is still debated by several societies. This review intends to provide an overview of the evolution of the screening and diagnostic criteria for GDM. Debatable issues regarding optimal screening strategies, especially in the low resource settings of low and middle income countries are highlighted. The recent Women in India with GDM Strategy (WINGS) project carried out in Chennai, India tried to develop a Model of Care for GDM suitable for resource constrained settings. The findings related to screening and diagnosis of GDM based on WINGS are also highlighted in this review. Based on the WINGS experience we believe that despite the constraints in low and middle income countries at the present time, the IADPSG criteria appears to be the best. This will also help to bring out a uniform criteria for screening and diagnosis of GDM worldwide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40842-016-0031-y

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In South America, there is a lack of uniform criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus and a lack of population-based incidence studies.

    “The problem that exists in South America is a lack of uniform criteria for diagnosing GDM and a lack of population-based incidence studies on the condition.”

    From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Background section on South and Central America describes different GDM diagnostic criteria and procedures across countries, supporting the lack of uniform criteria. It does not state that South America lacks population-based incidence studies; the study figure it gives concerns prevalence, not incidence (page unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Paraguay, Suriname, Bolivia, and Venezuela probably adopted the WHO/IADPSG criteria with regional modifications to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus.

    “They probably adopted the WHO/IADPSG criteria with regional modifications to diagnose GDM [78,96].”

    From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Background section, “Criteria for GDM diagnosis in South and Central America and Europe” (page unavailable), says some Latin American countries adopted IADPSG criteria and many incorporated local modifications. It does not identify Paraguay, Suriname, Bolivia, or Venezuela as countries that did so; the countries it names are different. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some Latin American countries have adopted the IADSPG criteria, but many have made locally adapted modifications due to practical problems in a resource-constrained environment.

    “Some Latin American countries have adopted the IADSPG criteria, but many of them have made locally adapted modifications due to the practical problems of implementing them in a resource-constrained environment [78].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29]Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy. World Health Organization 2013, p.63; WHO/ NMH/ MND/ 13.2 http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85975/1/WHO_NMH_MND_13.2_eng.pdf.Accessed on 25 Dec 2015 24199271
  2. [32]Criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in selected countries of the Americas. Final report of the Pan American Conference on Diabetes and Pregnancy. Available from: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/28208/9789275118832_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Last accessed 1st May 2016
  3. [34]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. NICE guidelines [NG3]. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3/evidence. Published February 2015. Last accessed 1st May 2016 25950069

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhavadharini, B., Uma, R., Saravanan, P., & Mohan, V.
Affiliations
  • Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (IN)
  • Seethapathy Clinic and Hospital (IN)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Mohan, V.
Venue
Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
13-13
ISSN
2055-8260 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2398617364
Cited by
75
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Abbott Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM screening, GDM diagnosis, IADPSG criteria, oral glucose tolerance test, diagnostic criteria, low- and middle-income countries, resource-limited settings, models of care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review