Cited by 40Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Efficacy and adherence of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in real-life settings

Open access
Guerci, B., Charbonnel, B., Gourdy, P., Hadjadj, S., Hanaire, H., Marre, M., Vergès, B.·2019·Diabetes & Metabolism

Abstract

Despite the availability of a large number of therapeutic options throughout the world, rates of optimal glycaemic control in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus remain low. Delays in treatment intensification to insulin and low adherence to insulin regimes, which are well-documented contributors to poor glycaemic control, are in many cases driven by fear of hypoglycaemic events, weight gain and injections. Over the last 10 years, injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have emerged as alternatives to basal insulin for treatment intensification in patients inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs. As a class, GLP1-RAs are associated with weight loss and fewer hypoglycaemic events than insulin. In addition, some of them are available in once-a-week formulations and therefore require fewer injections. However, as randomized controlled trials are not representative of everyday practice, physicians should consider the results of real-life studies to guide their treatment decisions. In this review, while significant variations in efficacy, tolerability and adherence data were noted from one study to another, rates of glycaemic control overall were low. Indeed, our present analysis has suggested that regular re-evaluations of treatment, including response, tolerability, adherence, cost and quality of life, are necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.01.006

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Reach G, Pechtner V, Gentilella R, Corcos A, Ceriello A. Clinical inertia and its impact on treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab 2017;43:501-11.
  2. Ratanawongsa N, Crosson JC, Schillinger D, Karter AJ, Saha CK, Marrero DG. Getting under the skin of clinical inertia in insulin initiation: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Insulin Starts Project. Diabetes Educ 2012;38:94-100.
  3. Reach G, Consoli SM, Halimi S, Colas C, Duclos M, Fontaine P, et al. The multinational second Diabetes, Attitudes, Wishes and Needs study: results of the French survey. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015;9:289-97.
  4. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38:140-9.
  5. Diamant M, Van Gaal L, Stranks S, Northrup J, Cao D, Taylor K, et al. Once weekly exenatide compared with insulin glargine titrated to target in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-3): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2010;375:2234-43.
  6. Russell-Jones D, Vaag A, Schmitz O, Sethi BK, Lalic N, Antic S, et al. Liraglutide vs insulin glargine and placebo in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEAD-5 met+SU): a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2009;52:2046-55.
  7. Weissman PN, Carr MC, Ye J, Cirkel DT, Stewart M, Perry C, et al. HARMONY 4: randomised clinical trial comparing once-weekly albiglutide and insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea. Diabetologia 2014;57:2475-84.
  8. Broglio F, Mannucci E, Napoli R, Nicolucci A, Purrello F, Nikonova E, et al. Beneficial effect of lixisenatide after 76 weeks of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis from the GetGoal programme. Diabetes Obes Metab 2017;19:248-56.
  9. Hernandez AF, Green JB, Janmohamed S, D'Agostino RB Sr, Granger CB, Jones NP, et al. Harmony Outcomes committees and investigatorsAlbiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018;392:1519- 29.
  10. Carls GS, Tuttle E, Tan RD, Huynh J, Yee J, Edelman SV, et al. Understanding the Gap Between Efficacy in Randomized Controlled Trials and Effectiveness in Real-World Use of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 Therapies in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1469-78.
  11. Knudsen JS, Thomsen RW, Pottegård A, Knop FK, Sørensen HT. Differences between randomized clinical trial patients and real-world initiators of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist liraglutide. Diabetes Care 2018;41:e133-e135.
  12. He Z, Wang S, Borhanian E, Weng C. Assessing the Collective Population Representativeness of Related Type 2 Diabetes Trials by Combining Public Data from ClinicalTrials.gov and NHANES. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015;216:569-73.
  13. Scheen AJ. Treatment-resistant type 2 diabetes: Which definition for clinical practice? Diabetes Metab 2017;43:295-7.
  14. Gautier JF, Martinez L, Penfornis A, Eschwege E, Charpentier G, Huret B, et al. Effectiveness and Persistence with Liraglutide Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Routine Clinical Practice--EVIDENCE: A Prospective, 2-Year Follow-Up, Observational, Post-Marketing Study. Adv Ther 2015;32:838-53.
  15. Mathieu C, Ostenson CG, Matthaei S, Reaney M, Krarup T, Guerci B, et al. Using Exenatide Twice Daily or Insulin in Clinical Practice: Results from CHOICE. Diabetes Ther 2013;4:285-308.
  16. Khunti K, Seidu S, Kunutsor S, Davies M. Association Between Adherence to Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1588-96.
  17. Courtney H, Nayar R, Rajeswaran C, Jandhyala R. Long-term management of type 2 diabetes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2017;10:79-87.
  18. Kesavadev J, Shankar A, Gopalakrishnan G, Jothydev S. Efficacy and safety of liraglutide therapy in 195 Indian patients with type 2 diabetes in real world setting. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2015;9:30-3.
  19. Carls GS, Tan R, Zhu JY, Tuttle E, Yee J, Edelman SV, et al. Real-world weight change among patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and sulfonylureas for type 2 diabetes and the influence of medication adherence. Obes Sci Pract 2017;3:342-51.
  20. Qiao Q, Johnsson K, Grandy S, Kostev K. Treatment Outcomes and Tolerability Following Initiation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Primary Care Practices in Germany. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017;11:272-7.
  21. McAdam-Marx C, Nguyen H, Schauerhamer MB, Singhal M, Unni S, Ye X, et al. Glycemic Control and Weight Outcomes for Exenatide Once Weekly Versus Liraglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A 1-Year Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Clin Ther 2016;38:2642-51.
  22. Unni S, Wittbrodt E, Ma J, Schauerhamer M, Hurd J, Ruiz-Negron N, et al. Comparative effectiveness of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with regard to 6- month glycaemic control and weight outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:468-473.
  23. Feher M, Vega-Hernandez G, Mocevic E, Buysse B, Myland M, Power GS, et al. Effectiveness of Liraglutide and Lixisenatide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Real- World Evidence from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database in the United Kingdom. Diabetes Ther 2017;8:417-31.
  24. Buysschaert M, D'Hooge D, Preumont V, Roots Study Group. ROOTS: A multicenter study in Belgium to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of liraglutide (Victoza®) in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2015;9:139-42.
  25. Anyanwagu U, Mamza J, Mehta R, Donnelly R, Idris I. Cardiovascular events and all- cause mortality with insulin versus glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue in type 2 diabetes. Heart 2016;102:1581-7.
  26. Toulis KA, Hanif W, Saravanan P, Willis BH, Marshall T, Kumarendran B, et al. All-cause mortality in patients with diabetes under glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists: A population- based, open cohort study. Diabetes Metab 2017;43:211-6.
  27. Currie CJ, Peyrot M, Morgan CL, Poole CD, Jenkins-Jones S, Rubin RR, et al. The impact of treatment noncompliance on mortality in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1279-84.
  28. Buysman EK, Liu F, Hammer M, Langer J. Impact of medication adherence and persistence on clinical and economic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide: a retrospective cohort study. Adv Ther 2015;32:341-55.
  29. Divino V, DeKoven M, Hallinan S, Varol N, Wirta SB, Lee WC, et al. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment patterns among type 2 diabetes patients in six European countries. Diabetes Ther 2014;5:499-520.
  30. Yu M, Xie J, Fernandez Lando L, Kabul S, Swindle RW. Liraglutide Versus Exenatide Once Weekly: Persistence, Adherence, and Early Discontinuation. Clin Ther 2016;38:149-60.
  31. Alatorre C, Fernandez Lando L, Yu M, Brown K, Montejano L, Juneau P, et al. Treatment patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: Higher adherence and persistence with dulaglutide compared with once-weekly exenatide and liraglutide. Diabetes Obes Metab 2017;19:953-61.
  32. Cai J, Wang Y, Baser O, Xie L, Chow W. Comparative persistence and adherence with newer anti-hyperglycemic agents to treat patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States. J Med Econ 2016;19:1175-86.
  33. Sikirica MV, Martin AA, Wood R, Leith A, Piercy J, Higgins V. Reasons for discontinuation of GLP1 receptor agonists: data from a real-world cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2017;10:403-12.
  34. Pelletier EM, Pawaskar M, Smith PJ, Best JH, Chapman RH. Economic outcomes of exenatide vs liraglutide in type 2 diabetes patients in the United States: results from a retrospective claims database analysis. J Med Econ 2012;15:1039-50.
  35. Johnston SS, Nguyen H, Felber E, Cappell K, Nelson JK, Chu BC, et al. Retrospective study of adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States. Adv Ther 2014;31:1119-33.
  36. Nguyen H, Dufour R, Caldwell-Tarr A. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP- 1RA) Therapy Adherence for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in a Medicare Population. Adv Ther 2017;34:658-73.
  37. Mody R, Grabner M, Yu M, Turner R, Kwan AYM, York W, et al. Real-world effectiveness, adherence and persistence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating dulaglutide treatment. Curr Med Res Opin 2018;34:995-1003.
  38. Gelhorn HL, Poon JL, Davies EW, Paczkowski R, Curtis SE, Boye KS. Evaluating preferences for profiles of GLP-1 receptor agonists among injection-naive type 2 diabetes patients in the UK. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015;9:1611-22.
  39. Qin L, Chen S, Flood E, Shaunik A, Romero B, de la Cruz M, et al. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment Attributes Important to Injection-Naive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Multinational Preference Study. Diabetes Ther 2017;8:321-34.
  40. Henry RR, Rosenstock J, Logan D, Alessi T, Luskey K, Baron MA. Continuous subcutaneous delivery of exenatide via ITCA 650 leads to sustained glycemic control and weight loss for 48 weeks in metformin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2014;28:393-8.
  41. Davies M, Pieber TR, Hartoft-Nielsen ML, Hansen OKH, Jabbour S, Rosenstock J. Effect of Oral Semaglutide Compared With Placebo and Subcutaneous Semaglutide on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017;318:1460-70.
  42. Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care 2005;43:521-30.
  43. Appleby J, Devlin N, Parkin D. NICE's cost effectiveness threshold. BMJ 2007;335:358- 9.
  44. Basson M, Ntais D, Ayyub R, Wright D, Lowin J, Chartier F, et al. The Cost-effectiveness of Dulaglutide 1.5mg versus Exenatide QW for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France. Diabetes Ther 2018; 9:13-25.
  45. Chuang LH, Verheggen BG, Charokopou M, Gibson D, Grandy S, Kartman B. Cost- effectiveness analysis of exenatide once-weekly versus dulaglutide, liraglutide, and lixisenatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis from the UK NHS perspective. J Med Econ 2016;19:1127-34.
  46. Hunt B, Kragh N, McConnachie CC, Valentine WJ, Rossi MC, Montagnoli R. Long-term Cost-effectiveness of Two GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Italian Setting: Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide. Clin Ther 2017;39:1347-59.
  47. Roussel R, Martinez L, Vandebrouck T, Douik H, Emiel P, Guery M, et al. Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes in France. J Med Econ 2016;19:121-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guerci, B., Charbonnel, B., Gourdy, P., Hadjadj, S., Hanaire, H., Marre, M., & Vergès, B.
Affiliations
  • Université de Lorraine (FR)
  • Université de Nantes (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
Corresponding author
Guerci, B.
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
528-535
ISSN
1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912404136
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes & Metabolism (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Intarcia Therapeutics
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Servier
  • Roche Diabetes Care
  • Novartis Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, glycemic control, insulin intensification, hypoglycemia, weight gain, real-world evidence, tolerability, quality of life, cost
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Drug Monitoring, Medication Adherence, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review