Cited by 93Diabetes Treatment and ManagementMedication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Management and Research

Adherence, persistence, glycaemic control and costs among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating dulaglutide compared with liraglutide or exenatide once weekly at 12‐month follow‐up in a real‐world setting in the United States

Open access
Mody, Reema, Huang, Qing, Yu, Maria, Zhao, Ruizhi, Patel, Hiren, Grabner, Michael, Landó, Laura Fernández·2019·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate adherence, persistence, glycaemic control and costs at 12‐month follow‐up for patients initiating dulaglutide versus liraglutide or exenatide once weekly. Materials and methods: The present retrospective observational claims study included patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for dulaglutide, liraglutide or exenatide once weekly from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database. Adherence was defined as proportion of days covered ≥80%, and persistence was measured by time to discontinuation of index therapy. Change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration was assessed in a subset with pre‐ and post‐index HbA1c results. Propensity scores were used to match the cohorts. Results: The baseline characteristics were balanced for the matched cohorts, dulaglutide versus liraglutide (n = 2471) and dulaglutide versus exenatide once weekly (n = 1891). Among those initiating dulaglutide there was a significantly higher proportion of adherent patients compared with the groups initiating liraglutide (51.2% vs. 38.2%; P < 0.001) and exenatide once weekly (50.7% vs. 31.9%; P < 0.001). At 12 months, 55% of patients in the dulaglutide group versus 43.8% in the liraglutide group ( P < 0.001), and 54.9% in the dulaglutide versus 34.4% in the exenatide once‐weekly group ( P < 0.001) were persistent. The dulaglutide group had a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c than the liraglutide group (−34.24 vs. −31.94 mmol/mol; P = 0.032), and a greater, but nonsignificant, reduction in HbA1c than the exenatide once‐weekly group (−34.46 vs. −31.94 mmol/mol; P = 0.056). The diabetes‐related total costs were not significantly different between the dulaglutide and the liraglutide group ($16,174 vs. $16,694; P = 0.184), and were significantly higher for dulaglutide than for exenatide once weekly ($15,768 vs. $14,615; P = 0.005). Conclusions: Adherence and persistence are important considerations in patient‐centric treatment selection for patients with T2D. Higher adherence and persistence for dulaglutide compared with liraglutide or exenatide once weekly are relevant criteria when choosing glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist treatment for patients with T2D.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.13603

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mody, R., Huang, Q., Yu, M., Zhao, R., Patel, H., Grabner, M., & Landó, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Carelon Research (United States) (US)
  • Eli Lilly (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Mody, Reema
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-09
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
920-929
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2904088434
Cited by
93
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
dulaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide once weekly, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, treatment persistence, glycemic control, HbA1c, GLP-1 receptor agonists, real-world evidence, health care costs, treatment discontinuation, health insurance claims data, HealthCore Integrated Research Database, propensity score matching
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Exenatide, Assessment of Medication Adherence, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Administration Schedule, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Male, Middle Aged, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Retrospective Studies, United States, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Drug Monitoring, Health Care Costs, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review