Cited by 904Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBody Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Appropriate waist circumference cutoff points for central obesity in Korean adults

Lee, Sang Yeoup, Park, Hye Soon, Kim, Dae Jung, Han, Jee Hye, Kim, Seon Mee, Cho, Guem Joo, Kim, Dae Young, Kwon, Hyuk Sang +5 more·2007·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background The International Diabetes Federation consensus recently proposed a new definition for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, incorporating ethnically specific waist circumference (WC) cutoff points. Objective We investigated the ethnically appropriate WC cutoff values for central obesity in Korean adults to predict increased risk of elevated triacylglycerol, reduced HDL cholesterol, elevated blood pressure, elevated fasting plasma glucose, or two or more of these factors. Design We used data from 6561 adults, aged 20-80 years, who participated in the Korean Health and Nutritional Examination Survey of 1998, a cross-sectional health survey of a nationally representative sample of Koreans. Results Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the WC value for predicting metabolic risk factors in Koreans was about 85 cm for men and 80 cm for women. The odds ratio for the risk of two or more metabolic risk factors increased abruptly in men with WC >or= 90 cm and women with WC >or= 85 cm. The 80th percentile for WC in the Korean population was 90 cm for men and 86.5 cm for women. Thus, the appropriate WC cutoff point for central obesity in Koreans was determined to be 90 cm for men and 85 cm for women. Conclusions Based on our criteria, the prevalence of central obesity was 19.8% in Korean men and 24.5% in Korean women. These findings suggest the applicability of ethnically specific cutoff points for WC in assessing central obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.04.013

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S. Y., Park, H. S., Kim, D. J., Han, J. H., Kim, S. M., Cho, G. J., Kim, D. Y., Kwon, H. S., Kim, S. R., Lee, C. B., Oh, S. J., Park, C. Y., & Yoo, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Ajou University (KR)
  • Eulji Medical Center (KR)
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
  • Hallym University (KR)
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
72-80
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068151605
Cited by
904
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 43
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
waist circumference, abdominal obesity, metabolic syndrome, cut-off values, ethnic specificity, Korean adults, metabolic risk factors, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Humans, Korea, Lipids, Middle Aged, Obesity, Probability, Risk Factors, Metabolic Syndrome, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review