Cited by 81Medication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Educational interventions aiming at improving adherence to treatment recommendations in type 2 diabetes

Wens, Johan, Vermeire, Etienne, Hearnshaw, Hilary, Lindenmeyer, Antje, Biot, Yves, Van Royen, Paul·2008·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Objective In the management of type 2 diabetes, a complex interaction takes place between medical professionals' treatment goals and patients' health beliefs about the disease and its treatment options. The contribution of self-management education to adherence in general or even more specifically to medicine taking is not known. We assessed educational interventions aimed at improving adherence to medical treatment recommendations, other than lifestyle advice.Study design Systematic literature review.Setting This paper represents an analysis of eight articles describing an educational intervention as a subgroup of a Cochrane Review [E. Vermeire, J. Wens, P. Van Royen, Y. Biot, H. Hearnshaw, A. Lindenmeyer, Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2, Art. No.: CD003638, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003638.pub2] on interventions to improve adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes.Results Four studies reported interventions using face-to-face education, two reported on the effects of group education and two on distance education by telemedicine. Due to poor quality of study designs, a variety of heterogeneous outcome measures in different time intervals, unclear definitions of adherence, and difficulties in evaluating different aspects of education performed, general conclusions could not be drawn.Conclusion Consistent conclusions about the effectiveness of educational interventions on adherence to treatment recommendations were hard to be drawn. There is an urgent need for well-designed intervention studies on the effect of different aspects of education on adherence to treatment recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.06.006

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wens, J., Vermeire, E., Hearnshaw, H., Lindenmeyer, A., Biot, Y., & Van Royen, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Wens, Johan
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
377-388
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1527244264
Cited by
81
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, educational intervention, self-management education, face-to-face teaching, group education, telemedicine, health beliefs, patient education
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review