Cited by 333Medication Adherence and ComplianceLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthPharmacy and Medical Practices

Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering medication

Open access
van Driel, Mieke L, Morledge, Michael D, Ulep, Robin, Shaffer, Johnathon P, Davies, Philippa, Deichmann, Richard·2016·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lipid-lowering drugs are widely underused, despite strong evidence indicating they improve cardiovascular end points. Poor patient adherence to a medication regimen can affect the success of lipid-lowering treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions aimed at improving adherence to lipid-lowering drugs, focusing on measures of adherence and clinical outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL up to 3 February 2016, and clinical trials registers (ANZCTR and ClinicalTrials.gov) up to 27 July 2016. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We evaluated randomised controlled trials of adherence-enhancing interventions for lipid-lowering medication in adults in an ambulatory setting with a variety of measurable outcomes, such as adherence to treatment and changes to serum lipid levels. Two teams of review authors independently selected the studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors extracted and assessed data, following criteria outlined by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADEPro. MAIN RESULTS: For this updated review, we added 24 new studies meeting the eligibility criteria to the 11 studies from prior updates. We have therefore included 35 studies, randomising 925,171 participants. Seven studies including 11,204 individuals compared adherence rates of those in an intensification of a patient care intervention (e.g. electronic reminders, pharmacist-led interventions, healthcare professional education of patients) versus usual care over the short term (six months or less), and were pooled in a meta-analysis. Participants in the intervention group had better adherence than those receiving usual care (odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29 to 2.88; 7 studies; 11,204 participants; moderate-quality evidence). A separate analysis also showed improvements in long-term adherence rates (more than six months) using intensification of care (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.91 to 4.29; 3 studies; 663 participants; high-quality evidence). Analyses of the effect on total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels also showed a positive effect of intensified interventions over both short- and long-term follow-up. Over the short term, total cholesterol decreased by a mean of 17.15 mg/dL (95% CI 1.17 to 33.14; 4 studies; 430 participants; low-quality evidence) and LDL-cholesterol decreased by a mean of 19.51 mg/dL (95% CI 8.51 to 30.51; 3 studies; 333 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Over the long term (more than six months) total cholesterol decreased by a mean of 17.57 mg/dL (95% CI 14.95 to 20.19; 2 studies; 127 participants; high-quality evidence). Included studies did not report usable data for health outcome indications, adverse effects or costs/resource use, so we could not pool these outcomes. We assessed each included study for bias using methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. In general, the risk of bias assessment revealed a low risk of selection bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias. There was unclear risk of bias relating to blinding for most studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence in our review demonstrates that intensification of patient care interventions improves short- and long-term medication adherence, as well as total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels. Healthcare systems which can implement team-based intensification of patient care interventions may be successful in improving patient adherence rates to lipid-lowering medicines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd004371.pub4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • van Driel et al., 2016 described 7 categories of interventions and demonstrated their potential to enhance adherence and improve clinical outcomes.

    “van Driel et al., 2016 described 7 categories of interventions (simplifying drug regimen, patient education, intensified patient care, behavioural approaches, decision support systems, administrative process improvements, pharmacy-led interventions) and demonstrated their potential to enhance adherence and improve clinical outcomes.6”

    From Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results matrix lists the seven intervention categories. The Discussion reports improved adherence and cholesterol levels for intensified patient care, but says several other categories did not consistently improve adherence or physiological outcomes. Thus the claim overstates the evidence if it attributes demonstrated benefits to all seven categories. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The search period began in 2016 to ensure continuity with and update the previous review by van Driel et al. (2016).

    “The search period began in 2016 to ensure continuity with and update the previous review by van Driel et al. (2016).6”
  • We adopted van Driel et al.'s, 2016 intervention categorisation for ease of comparison, which may have introduced classification biases.

    “Furthermore, we adopted van Driel et al.'s, 2016 intervention categorisation for an ease of comparison,6 which may have introduced classification biases.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Thom S, Field J, Poulter N, Patel A, Prabhakaran D, Stanton A, et al. Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE): rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial of a cardiovascular preventive polypill-based strategy in India and Europe. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2014;21:252-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994;344(8934):1383-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in AdultsA Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):s1-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Armour C, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Brilliant M, Burton D, Emmerton L, Krass I, et al. Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) improves outcomes for patients in the community. Thorax 2007;62:496-592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Athyros VG, Papageorgiou AA, Mercouris BR, Athyrou VV, Symeonidis AN, Basayannis EO, et al. Treatment with atorvastatin to the National Cholesterol Educational Program goal versus 'usual' care in secondary coronary heart disease prevention. The GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2002;18(4):220-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Avorn J, Monette J, Lacour A, Bohn RL, Monane M, Mogun H, et al. Persistence of use of lipid-lowering medications. JAMA 1998;279(18):1458-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Buck G, Pollicino C, et al, Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: Prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;366(9493):1267-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benner JS, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC, Avorn J. Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients. JAMA 2002;288(4):455-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blackburn DF, Dobson RT, Blackburn JL, Wilson TW. Cardiovascular morbidity associated with nonadherence to statin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 2005;25(8):1035-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng CW, Woo K-S, Chan JC, Tomlinson B, You JH. Association between adherence to statin therapy and lipid control in Hong Kong Chinese patients at high risk of coronary heart disease. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2004;58(5):528-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Costa E, Giardini A, Savin M, Menditto E, Lehane E, Laosa O, et al. Interventional tools to improve medication adherence: review of literature. Patient Preference and Adherence 2015;9:1303–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309(6964):1286-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ebrahim S. Detection, adherence and control of hypertension for the prevention of stroke: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 1998;2(11):1-78. [www.hta.ac.uk/project.asp?PjtId=881] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jackevicius CA, Mamdani M, Tu JV. Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2002;288(4):462-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
  16. Lewis DK, Robinson J, Wilkinson E. Factors involved in deciding to start preventive treatment: qualitative study of clinicians' and lay people's attitudes. BMJ 2003;327(7419):841-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1998;339(19):1349-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mahtani KR, Heneghan CJ, Glasziou PP, Perera R. Reminder packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-term medications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 9. Art. No: CD005025. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005025.pub3] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. Marinker M. From Compliance to Concordance: Towards Shared Goals in Medicine taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360(9326):7-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mullen PD. Compliance becomes concordance. BMJ 1997;314(7082):691-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Muller-Nordhorn J, Willich SN. Effectiveness of interventions to increase adherence to statin therapy. Disease Management of Health Outcomes 2005;13(2):72-82. [1173-8790/05/0002-0073/$34.95/0] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pasina L, Brucato AL, Falcone C, Cucchi E, Bresciani A, Sottocorno M, et al. Medication non-adherence among elderly patients newly discharged and receiving polypharmacy. Drugs & Aging 2014;31(4):283–9. [DOI: 10.1007/s40266-014-0163-7] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. Primatesta P, Poulter NR. Lipid concentrations and the use of lipid lowering drugs: evidence from a national cross sectional survey. BMJ 2000;321(7272):1322-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rash JA, Campbell DJ, Tonelli M, Campbell TS. A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to statin medication: what do we know about what works? Preventive Medicine 2016;90:155-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.006] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. Rosenson R, Kent ST, Brown TM, Farkouh ME, Levitan EB, Yun H, et al. Underutilization of high-intensity statin therapy after hospitalization for coronary heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015;65(3):270-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rueda S, Park-Wyllie LY, Bayoumi A, Tynan A-M, Antoniou T, Rourke S, et al. Patient support and education for promoting adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. Art. No: CD001442. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001442.pub2] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. Sackett DL, Haynes RB. Compliance with Therapeutic Regimens. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335(14):1001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment in patients with high blood pressure in ambulatory settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No: CD004804. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004804] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. Tsuyuki RT, Bungard TJ. Poor adherence with hypolipidemic drugs: a lost opportunity. Pharmacotherapy 2001;21(5):576-82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denekens J. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2001;26(5):331-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vermeire EIJJ, Wens J, Van Royen P, Biot Y, Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No: CD003638. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003638.pub2] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  34. Wei L, Wang J, Thompson P, Wong S, Struthers AD, MacDonald TM. Adherence to statin treatment and readmission of patients after myocardial infarction: a six year follow up study. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2002;88(3):229-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schedlbauer A, Schroeder K. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid lowering medication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 2. Art. No: CD004371. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004371] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  36. Schedlbauer A, Schroeder K, Peters TJ, Fahey T. Interventions for improving adherence to lipid lowering medication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. Art. No: CD004371. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004371.pub2] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  37. Schedlbauer A, Davies P, Fahey T. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid lowering medication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. Art. No: CD004371. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004371.pub3] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Driel, M. L., Morledge, M. D., Ulep, R., Shaffer, J. P., Davies, P., & Deichmann, R.
Affiliations
  • Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Australia
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Ochsner Health System (US)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12-21
Volume
2021
Issue
3
Pages
CD004371-CD004371
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1651579527
Cited by
333
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, lipid-lowering drugs, adherence interventions, electronic reminders, pharmacist intervention, patient education, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk reduction, statins, ezetimibe, hypercholesterolemia, dyslipidemia, outpatient care, long-term adherence, serum lipids, cardiovascular events, quality of life
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adult, Hypolipidemic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Drug Monitoring, Reminder Systems, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review