Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Emergency Preparedness and Professional Competency Among Health Care Providers During Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Pilot Study Results

Slepski, Lynn A.·2007·Disaster Management & Response

Abstract

Background To date, no systematic examination of the preparedness of individual health care providers and their response capabilities during a large-scale disaster has been conducted. As a result, very little is known about what knowledge, skills and abilities, or professional competencies are needed, or how professional competency requirements may change depending on the circumstances of a disaster. The objective of this pilot study was to collect, explore, and describe background data on professional competencies from health care providers who were involved in the Hurricanes Katrina and/or Rita disaster responses. Methods Utilizing an anonymous survey of a convenience sample, 200 health care providers attending 2 disaster conferences were asked to respond to open-ended questions about the competencies they needed and performed during their disaster response. Results Of the 200 respondents, registered nurses (37%) and physicians (24%) were the largest categories of providers. Basic clinical care (39%) and triage (26%) were the most frequent response skills reported; the areas wherein respondents felt least prepared were disaster-specific response skills (22%) and systems issues (34%). Only 22% of respondents reported that they did not know a specific skill. The 200 respondents made 495 individual recommendations for future responders, including actions to improve the respondent's personal preparedness (23%) and the need for training (25%). However, only 3% of the recommendat…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dmr.2007.08.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Slepski, 2005, Emergency preparedness: concept development for nursing practice, Nurs Clin North Am, 40, 419, 10.1016/j.cnur.2005.04.011 · DOI
  2. Everly, 2002, Thoughts on training guidelines in emergency mental health and crisis intervention, Int J Emerg Ment Health, 4, 139
  3. Farmer, 2006, Providing critical care during a disaster: the interface between disaster response agencies and hospitals, Crit Care Med, 34, S56, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000199989.44467.2E · DOI
  4. Veenema, 2002, Chemical and biological terrorism preparedness for staff development specialists, J Nurs Staff Develop, 19, 215, 10.1097/00124645-200309000-00001 · DOI
  5. Waeckerle JA. Emergency departments: the Achilles heel of domestic preparedness. Paper presentation at the Future of Emergency Care Conference. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine; February 2-4, 2004.
  6. Gebbie, 2002, Emergency and disaster preparedness: core competencies for nurses, Am J Nurs, 102, 46, 10.1097/00000446-200201000-00023 · DOI
  7. Streubert, 1991, Phenomenologic research as a theoretic initiative in community health nursing, Public Health Nurs, 8, 119, 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1991.tb00655.x · DOI
  8. Hinton Walker, 2005, Research issues in preparedness for mass casualty events, disaster, war and terrorism, Nurs Clin North Am, 40, 551, 10.1016/j.cnur.2005.04.008 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Slepski, L. A.
Venue
Disaster Management & Response
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
99-110
ISSN
1540-2487
Cited by
72
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergency Preparedness and Professional Competency Among Health Care Providers During Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Pilot Study Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dmr.2007.08.001
The paper
Slepski, L. A. (2007). Emergency Preparedness and Professional Competency Among Health Care Providers During Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Pilot Study Results. Disaster Management & Response. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dmr.2007.08.001