The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
A systematic review was conducted of studies evaluating the effects of interventions aimed at reducing ethnic prejudice and discrimination in young children. Articles published between 1980 and 2010 and including children of 8 years and under were identified, harvested, and assessed for quality, both for the exposure/program as well as for the evaluation. In total, 32 studies (14 contact and 18 media or instruction) yielded 62 effects on attitudes and 59 effects on peer relations. An overall count of the positive (40%), non-significant (50%), and negative effects (10%) indicate a mixed picture. Overall, more attitude effects (55%) than peer relations effects (25%) were positive, and media/instruction (47%) was more successful than contact (36%). Most of the effects were observed with children from a majority ethnicity: 67% of the attitude effects were positive, and media/instruction and contact were equally effective at delivering these. Few differences were found as a function of the quality of the exposure and evaluation, but differences were found depending on the context of exposure (naturally occurring or experimental manipulation) and research design (random assignment or self-selection). In conclusion, the findings were more mixed than expected, though sufficiently strong studies exist to provide lessons for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 9,708 · cited 3×
“While reviews across the age span have shown positive effects of contact (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006), no prior systematic reviews have integrated the effects of media or antibias instruction.”
Self-citationDowns, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Deeks, J., Dinnes, J., D'Amico, R., Sowden, A., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., Petticrew, M., & Altman, D. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7270 · Cited by 2,907
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2 · Cited by 481
Cited by
Racism and Health II: A Needed Research Agenda for Effective Interventions
Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213487341 · Cited by 189
“A range of interventions also show promise in reducing prejudice in early childhood (Aboud et al., 2012).”
BackgroundRacial/ethnic socialization for White youth: What we know and future directions
Loyd, A. B., & Gaither, S. E. (2018) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2018.05.004 · Cited by 170
Celano, M., Hazzard, A., & Rivera, V. A. (2023) · Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-9655-8.ch004 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Aboud, F. E., Tredoux, C., Tropp, L. R., Brown, C. S., Niens, U., & Noor, N. M.
- Venue
- Developmental Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-336
- ISSN
- 0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990662477
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dr.2012.05.001
- The paper
- Aboud, F. E., Tredoux, C., Tropp, L. R., Brown, C. S., Niens, U., & Noor, N. M. (2012). Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review. Developmental Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.05.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.