CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 159Personal Information Management and User BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 384 of the 384 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growing up multitasking: The costs and benefits for cognitive development

Courage, Mary L., Bakhtiar, Aishah, Fitzpatrick, Cheryll, Kenny, Sophie, Brandeau, Katie·2015·Developmental Review
DOI 10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.002

Cites

384 of 384 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 384 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Anderson, 2001, Peril and potential of media for infants, Zero to Three, 22, 10
  2. Gonzales, V. M., & Mark, G. (2004). Constant, constant multitasking craziness: Managing multiple working spheres. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 2004 (pp. 113–120). New York: ACM Press.
  3. Karsenti, 2012, Ups and downs of computer science projects in primary and secondary Canadian schools, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2, 130
  4. Kearney, P. (2005). Cognitive callisthenics: Do FPS computer games enhance the player's cognitive skills? In Proceedings of DiGra 2005 Changing views: Worlds in Play International Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
  5. Levy, 2001, Is dualtask slowing instruction dependent?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 27, 862
  6. Sarama, 2009, “Concrete” computer manipulatives in mathematics education, Child Development Perspectives, 3, 145, 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00095.x · DOI
  7. Smeets, 2014, The interactive animated e-book as a word learning device for kindergarteners, Applied Psycholinguistics. Published on-line January, 2014
  8. Tuzun, 2008, The effects of computer games on primary students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning, Computers & Education, 52

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–158 of 158

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Courage, M. L., Bakhtiar, A., Fitzpatrick, C., Kenny, S., & Brandeau, K.
Affiliations
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
Courage, Mary L.
ORCID
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
35
Pages
5-41
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.002
OpenAlex
W2090088049
Semantic Scholar
6be98a4810cd13a62632fb43e32152197962f236
Cited by
159
References
384
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5
FWCI
27.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (418206-2012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
multitasking, cognitive development, divided attention, task switching, dual-task performance, executive function, attention, multimedia learning, superficial learning, neuroergonomics, developmental appropriateness, attention training, children and adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review