Cited by 185Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

An upward spiral: Bidirectional associations between positive affect and positive aspects of close relationships across the life span

Ramsey, Meagan A., Gentzler, Amy L.·2015·Developmental Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dr.2015.01.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 350 · Cited by 185

Authors
Ramsey, M. A., & Gentzler, A. L.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, Meagan A.
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
36
Pages
58-104
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990495792
Cited by
185
References
350
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
20.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
positive affect, positive emotions, close relationships, bidirectional relationship, reciprocal effects, parent-child relationship, friendship, romantic relationships, happiness, lifespan development, interpersonal emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review