Cited by 81Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Enhancing social connectedness in anxiety and depression through amplification of positivity: Preliminary treatment outcomes and process of change

Open access
Taylor, Charles T., Pearlstein, Sarah L., Kakaria, Sanskruti, Lyubomirsky, Sonja, Stein, Murray B.·2020·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Abstract

Background Anxiety and depressive disorders are often characterized by perceived social disconnection, yet evidence-based treatments produce only modest improvements in this domain. The well-established link between positive affect (PA) and social connectedness suggests that directly targeting PA in treatment may be valuable. Method A secondary analysis of a waitlist-controlled trial (N = 29) was conducted to evaluate treatment response and process of change in social connectedness within a 10-session positive activity intervention protocol—Amplification of Positivity (AMP)—designed to increase PA in individuals seeking treatment for anxiety or depression (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02330627). Perceived social connectedness and PA/negative affect (NA) were assessed throughout treatment. Time-lagged multilevel mediation models examined the process of change in affect and connectedness throughout treatment. Results The AMP group displayed significantly larger improvements in social connectedness from pre- to post-treatment compared to waitlist; improvements were maintained through 6-month follow-up. Within the AMP group, increases in PA and decreases in NA both uniquely predicted subsequent increases in connectedness throughout treatment. However, experiencing heightened NA throughout treatment attenuated the effect of changes in PA on connectedness. Improvements in connectedness predicted subsequent increases in PA, but not changes in NA. Conclusions These preliminary findings suggest that positive activity interventions may be valuable for enhancing social connectedness in individuals with clinically impairing anxiety or depression, possibly through both increasing positive emotions and decreasing negative emotions.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a secondary analysis of a waitlist-controlled trial, a 10-session positive activity intervention (Amplification of Positivity; AMP) produced significantly greater improvements in perceived social connectedness than waitlist in treatment-seeking adults with anxiety or depression. Within AMP, increases in positive affect and decreases in negative affect each predicted later increases in connectedness, though high negative affect attenuated the positive-affect pathway.

Key findings

  • AMP showed greater post-treatment social connectedness than waitlist after controlling for baseline: F(1, 25) = 7.49, p = .011, η²p = .23, between-group Cohen’s d = 1.07; within-group pre-post effect was Cohen’s d_av = 1.28 for AMP vs 0.48 for waitlist.
  • AMP gains were maintained through 6-month follow-up: repeated-measures ANOVA Time effect F(1.657, 23.194) = 15.49, p < .001, η²p = .53; post-treatment and follow-up scores did not significantly differ.
  • Clinically significant improvement on the SCS-R occurred in 56% (9/16) of AMP participants vs 17% (2/12) of waitlist participants, Fisher’s exact p = .054; no participants met criteria for clinically significant deterioration.
  • In time-lagged multilevel mediation, increases in positive affect predicted later connectedness (B = 0.40, p = .005; indirect ab = .5440, 95% CI [.1538, 1.04742]) and decreases in negative affect predicted later connectedness (B = −.33, p = .024; indirect ab = .5511, 95% CI [.09437, 1.08638]); when both were modeled together, positive affect remained significant (B = .36, p = .012) while negative affect was marginal (B = −.28, p = .058), and the PA × NA interaction predicted connectedness (B = −.040, p = .005). Connectedness predicted later positive affect (B = .19, p = .001) but not later negative affect (B = −.04, p = .47).

Methods

  • Secondary analysis of a waitlist-controlled randomized trial (N = 29; AMP n = 16, waitlist n = 13) in individuals seeking treatment for anxiety or depression, recruited via clinical referrals and community/online announcements; inclusion required OASIS ≥ 8 or PHQ-9 ≥ 10, and diagnoses were assessed with the MINI for DSM-5.
  • AMP consisted of 10 individual 60-minute sessions; social connectedness was measured with the 20-item Social Connectedness Scale–Revised (SCS-R) and affect with the 20-item PANAS pre/post and throughout treatment, with 3- and 6-month follow-up for AMP completers.
  • Group differences at post-treatment were tested with ANCOVA controlling for baseline SCS-R; within-AMP change processes were tested with time-lagged multilevel mediation models (n = 20 who initiated AMP, including 4 waitlist participants later treated), using lower-level mediation and asymmetric confidence intervals via PRODCLIN.

Limitations

  • The paper states the sample was small and the comparison was a no-intervention waitlist that completed measures only at pre- and post-treatment; it notes possible nonrepresentativeness, baseline group differences (more AMP participants had prior psychological treatment: 88% vs 50%), and that waitlist improvements may reflect natural fluctuation, treatment expectancy, or sampling bias.
  • The paper states that larger samples are needed to test integrated moderated mediation models, that treatment fidelity/adherence was not formally assessed, that all measures were self-report, that the SCS-R does not capture full social functioning, and that some AMP participants remained socially disconnected post-treatment.
  • Evident from the text: the small sample limits power, especially for negative-affect and connectedness associations; the waitlist design cannot account for common therapeutic factors such as therapist attention or patient expectations; and the lack of repeated control-group assessments precludes multilevel comparison of treatment effects.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-020-10102-7

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Experiencing heightened negative affect throughout treatment attenuated the effect of changes in positive affect on social connectedness.

    “However, experiencing heightened NA throughout treatment attenuated the effect of changes in PA on connectedness.”
    • Also stated in: § Changes in Affect as a Mediator of Increases in Connectedness Throughout Treatment · plain
      “The interaction of PA x NA significantly predicted changes in connectedness (B = −.040, p = .005, path b1*b2, Table 2, Model 5). An examination of the pattern of estimated means from the multilevel model revealed that the association between PA and increases in connectedness was attenuated at higher levels of NA”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The AMP group displayed significantly larger improvements in social connectedness from pre- to post-treatment compared to the waitlist group.

    “The AMP group displayed significantly larger improvements in social connectedness from pre- to post-treatment compared to waitlist; improvements were maintained through 6-month follow-up.”
    • Also stated in: § Changes in Social Connectedness · boosted
      “Results of the ANCOVA conducted on the SCS-R revealed that individuals in the AMP group demonstrated significantly greater perceived social connectedness at post-treatment compared to participants in the WL group, F(1, 25) = 7.49, p = .011, η2p = .23 (Cohen’s d = 1.07).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Within the AMP group, decreases in negative affect predicted subsequent increases in social connectedness throughout treatment.

    “Within the AMP group, increases in PA and decreases in NA both uniquely predicted subsequent increases in connectedness throughout treatment.”
    • Also stated in: § Changes in Affect as a Mediator of Increases in Connectedness Throughout Treatment · plain
      “Decreases in NA significantly predicted increases in connectedness when entered in the multilevel model together with time (B = −.33, p = .024, path b, Figure 2b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Improvements in social connectedness were maintained through 6-month follow-up in the AMP group.

    “improvements were maintained through 6-month follow-up.”
    • Also stated in: § Changes in Social Connectedness · hedged
      “Post-treatment and follow-up scores did not significantly differ (all ps > .05), which indicated that initial gains were maintained up to 6-months following the end of treatment (see Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    No participants met criteria for clinically significant deterioration.

    “No participants met criteria for clinically significant deterioration (defined by RCI < −1.96).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The proportion of participants achieving clinically significant improvement on the SCS-R was 56% in the AMP group and 17% in the waitlist group.

    “The proportion of participants who achieved clinically significant improvement on the SCS-R was 56% (9/16) in the AMP group and 17% (2/12) in the WL group, Fisher’s exact = .054.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Improvements in social connectedness predicted subsequent increases in positive affect, but not changes in negative affect.

    “Improvements in connectedness predicted subsequent increases in PA, but not changes in NA.”
    • Also stated in: § Changes in Affect as a Mediator of Increases in Connectedness Throughout Treatment · plain
      “increases in social connectedness predicted subsequent increases in PA when entered in the multilevel model together with time (B = .19, p = .001, path b). Those effects remained robust when controlling for NA at time t. This was a significant mediating effect (ab = .2412; 95% CI [.07398, .4631]). In contrast, changes in social connectedness did not predict later changes in NA (B = −.04, p = .47,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Time significantly predicted positive affect, negative affect, and social connectedness ratings, such that participants reported increasing positive affect and connectedness and decreasing negative affect as treatment progressed.

    “time significantly predicted PANAS-PA and NA, as well as SCS-R ratings, such that participants reported feeling increasing levels of PA and connectedness, as well as decreasing levels of NA as treatment progressed (all p < .001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When positive and negative affect were entered together, increases in positive affect significantly predicted increases in social connectedness, while change in negative affect was only a marginally significant predictor.

    “increases in PA significantly predicted increases in social connectedness when simultaneously accounting for time and changes in NA (B = .36, p = .012, path b1, Table 2, Model 4). The indirect effect (ab) of time on connectedness through increases in PA remained significant when accounting for change in NA (ab = .4896; 95% CI [.1099, .9776]). Change in NA was a marginally significant predictor of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AMP significantly increased positive emotions and decreased negative emotions and symptoms of anxiety and depression in a prior waitlist-controlled randomized clinical trial, with large effects (Cohen's d > .90).

    “Results of a waitlist-controlled randomized clinical trial revealed that AMP significantly increased positive emotions as well as decreased negative emotions and symptoms of anxiety and depression (all within- and between-group AMP effects on the composite outcomes were large; Cohen’s d > .90; Taylor, Lyubomirsky et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Taylor, Lyubomirsky et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Excessive negative affect can lead to lower participation in social activities, diminished engagement in social relationships, and poorer interpersonal outcomes.

    “Excessive negative affect—produced by over-activation of the negative valence (avoidance/aversive) system (Elliot, 2006; Gray, 1987; Lang, 1995)—can lead to lower participation in social activities, diminished engagement in social relationships, and ultimately poorer interpersonal outcomes (e.g., loneliness, diminished relationship satisfaction; Gable & Berkman, 2008; Impett et al., 2010; Trew, 20”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gable & Berkman, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Impett et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Trew, 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Positive activities increase perceived social connectedness and positive relationship functioning in non-clinical samples and in those with elevated social anxiety.

    “Research from affective and relational science demonstrates that positive activities increase perceived social connectedness and positive relationship functioning (e.g., relationship satisfaction) in non-clinical samples (Algoe, Fredrickson, & Gable, 2013; O’Connell, Shea, & Gallagher, 2016; Nelson et al., 2016), and in those with elevated social anxiety (Alden & Trew, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Algoe, Fredrickson, & Gable, 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites O’Connell, Shea, & Gallagher, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nelson et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Preliminary findings suggest that positive activity interventions may be valuable for enhancing social connectedness in individuals with clinically impairing anxiety or depression, possibly through both increasing positive emotions and decreasing negative emotions.

    “These preliminary findings suggest that positive activity interventions may be valuable for enhancing social connectedness in individuals with clinically impairing anxiety or depression, possibly through both increasing positive emotions and decreasing negative emotions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Treatment fidelity was not formally assessed.

    “Therapists met weekly to review ongoing cases and treatment adherence; however, treatment fidelity was not formally assessed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Assumptions underlying the ANCOVA were met: independence of the covariate and treatment group, and homogeneity of regression slopes.

    “We confirmed that assumptions underlying ANCOVA were met: independence of the covariate [pre-treatment scores] and treatment group, t(26) = 1.52, p = .14, and homogeneity of regression slopes such that the covariate (baseline SCS-R scores) and treatment group did not interact in predicting the outcome, F(1, 24) = .00, p = 1.0, η2p = .00.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Analyses were conducted on an intent-to-treat basis.

    “Analyses were conducted on an intent-to-treat (ITT) basis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Post-treatment follow-up data were not included in the mediation analyses.

    “Post-treatment follow-up data was not included in these analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule has high internal consistency and temporal stability, and its validity is supported by correlational data and confirmatory factor analyses.

    “The PANAS has high internal consistency and temporal stability (trait version), and correlational data and confirmatory factor analyses support its validity (Crawford & Henry, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crawford & Henry, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    One participant in the AMP group discontinued treatment following session 7, and one participant in the waitlist group initiated treatment outside the study and was excluded from analyses.

    “One participant in the AMP group discontinued treatment following session 7, and one participant in the WL group initiated treatment outside of the study following randomization and therefore was excluded from the analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Mid-treatment (session 5) data were used for the post-assessment for the one participant who discontinued treatment following session 7.

    “Mid-treatment (session 5) data were used for the post-assessment for the one participant who discontinued treatment following session 7.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The mediator and outcome variable were time lagged to conduct a more rigorous test of mediation in which the mediator temporally precedes the outcome.

    “The mediator and outcome variable were time lagged (Aderka, Foa, Applebaum, Shafran, & Gilboa-Schechtman, 2011; Bomyea et al., 2015) in order to conduct a more rigorous test of mediation in which the mediator temporally precedes the outcome (Kazdin, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Aderka, Foa, Applebaum, Shafran, & Gilboa-Schechtman, 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bomyea et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kazdin, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Social Connectedness Scale-Revised displays high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity.

    “The SCS-R displays high internal consistency, test-retest reliability (examined over a 1-month period), and convergent validity (Lee et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    No evidence of influential outlying data was found.

    “We screened for outliers within the multilevel modeling framework using the R package influence.ME (Nieuwenhuis, Pelzer, & Grotenhuis, 2012) and found no evidence of influential outlying data (all Cook’s distance < 1; Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Nieuwenhuis, Pelzer, & Grotenhuis, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    A lower level mediation approach was used because of the longitudinal nature of the data.

    “A lower level mediation approach was used because of the longitudinal nature of the data—that is, the predictor variable (time) and mediators (affect) were Level 1 variables measured repeatedly throughout treatment (Bauer, Preacher, & Gil, 2006; Kenny, Korchmaros, & Bolger, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bauer, Preacher, & Gil, 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kenny, Korchmaros, & Bolger, 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Treatment regimens such as AMP may offer a different pathway or possibly added benefit for enhancing social connectedness.

    “Treatment regimens such as AMP, which explicitly target the upregulation of positive emotions through a wide variety of techniques (see also Craske et al., 2019; Dunn et al., 2019) may offer a different pathway or possibly added benefit for enhancing social connectedness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Craske et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dunn et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Current empirically supported treatments for anxiety and depression predominately aim to decrease negative affect.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    AMP decreases negative affect to a magnitude comparable to increases in positive affect.

    “it was previously shown to decrease negative affect to a magnitude comparable to increases in positive affect (Taylor, Lyubomirsky et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Taylor, Lyubomirsky et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In existing treatments for anxiety and depression, improvement in positive affect tends to be modest and does not always match changes in negative affect or symptoms, nor return to normative levels, on average.

    “improvement in positive affect tends to be modest and does not always match changes in negative affect or symptoms, nor return to normative levels, on average (Dunn et al., 2020; Kring et al., 2007; Sewart et al., 2019; Strege et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dunn et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kring et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sewart et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The control group was a no intervention (waitlist) group that only completed measures at pre- and post-treatment.

    “The effect of the AMP regimen was evaluated in a small sample and compared to a no intervention (waitlist) group that only completed measures at pre- and post-treatment (cf. repeated measures throughout treatment), which introduces several caveats.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Discordance between positive affective experience and behavior relates to increased likelihood of developing depression and diminished well-being over time, in part by disrupting social connectedness.

    “discordance between positive affective experience vs. behavior relates to increased likelihood of developing depression and diminished well-being over time, in part by disrupting social connectedness (Mauss et al., 2011; although for a discussion on important cultural differences see Su, Lee, & Oishee, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mauss et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    AMP fidelity and adherence were not formally assessed.

    “although therapists followed a structured manual and were monitored closely during weekly supervision, AMP fidelity and adherence were not formally assessed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All measures were self-reported.

    “Further, all measures were self-reported, and perceived social connectedness does not capture the full complexity of an individual’s social functioning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The multilevel models tested herein separately evaluated main effects mediational pathways, as well as the interaction of PA and NA in predicting social connectedness.

    “Second, the multilevel models tested herein separately evaluated main effects mediational pathways, as well as the interaction of PA and NA in predicting social connectedness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The small sample increases the likelihood of baseline group differences (in this case, engagement in prior psychosocial treatment), the influence of which cannot be adequately determined.

    “It also increases the likelihood of baseline group differences (in this case, engagement in prior psychosocial treatment), the influence of which cannot be adequately determined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The current study is the first, to the authors' knowledge, to examine the temporal process of change in affect and social connectedness throughout treatment.

    “The current study contributes to this wider body of research and is the first, to our knowledge, to examine the temporal process of change in affect and social connectedness throughout treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The chosen sample may not be representative of the target population and may produce outcomes that over- or underestimate the true treatment effect.

    “First, the chosen sample may not be representative of the target population and may produce outcomes that over- or underestimate the true treatment effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Subjective measures of social functioning (e.g., loneliness) correlate with behavioral measures (e.g., social network size, frequency of engaging in social activities), but these indices are not fully redundant.

    “Although subjective measures of social functioning (e.g., loneliness) correlate with behavioral measures (e.g., social network size, frequency of engaging in social activities), these indices are not fully redundant (Saris et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saris et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The perception that we are connected to others is a basic human need that is linked to mental and physical well-being.

    “The perception that we are connected to others is a basic human need that is linked to mental and physical well-being (Cacioppo & Cacioppo, 2018; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010, 2015; Lyubomirsky et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cacioppo & Cacioppo, 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lyubomirsky et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four waitlist participants who subsequently enrolled in the AMP protocol are comparable to the sixteen participants initially randomized to AMP, so they can be combined for within-treatment analyses.

    “This analysis focused on all participants who initiated the AMP protocol (n=20), including those initially randomized to the AMP group (n=16), as well as those from the WL group who subsequently enrolled in the AMP protocol (n=4).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The waitlist control condition adequately controls for natural recovery and non-specific effects, so that between-group differences can be attributed to AMP.

    “Data originated from a randomized controlled trial comparing the AMP protocol to a WL control condition (see Taylor, Lyubomirsky et al., 2017, for additional details regarding the study procedures).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Current empirically supported treatments for anxiety and depression predominately aim to decrease negative affect.

    “Current empirically supported treatments for anxiety and depression predominately aim to decrease negative affect.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(26) = 1.52reported p = .14 · recomputed p = .141

    “t(26) = 1.52, p = .14”

  • ConsistentF(1, 24) = 0reported p = 1 · recomputed p = 1.000

    “F(1, 24) = .00, p = 1.0”

  • ConsistentF(1, 25) = 7.49reported p = .011 · recomputed p = .011

    “F(1, 25) = 7.49, p = .011”

  • ConsistentF(1.657, 23.194) = 15.49reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1.657, 23.194) = 15.49, p < .001”

4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Abstract overstates the unique effect of negative affect

    Major

    The abstract says decreases in negative affect uniquely predicted subsequent increases in connectedness. In the model that accounts for positive affect, however, the negative-affect predictor was only marginally significant (p = .058), and its indirect effect was not significant.

  • Negative-affect coefficient is inconsistent with its indirect effect

    Minor

    The reported B = −28 is inconsistent with the reported indirect effect of .4676. The earlier negative-affect results imply a time-to-negative-affect coefficient of about −1.67 (.5511 ÷ −.33); multiplied by −28, that would give an indirect effect of about 46.76, whereas a coefficient of −.28 would give .4676.

2 of 2

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 106 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, C. T., Pearlstein, S. L., Kakaria, S., Lyubomirsky, S., & Stein, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Charles T.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2020-04-19
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
788-800
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W3017191344
Cited by
81
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California, San Diego, National Institute of Health Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program (UL1TR001442)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R61MH113769)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
social connectedness, anxiety, depression, positive affect, negative affect, change processes, treatment response, social disconnection, positive emotions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review