Cited by 94Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRIAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Looking for the lighthouse: A systematic review of advanced theory-of-mind tests beyond preschool

Osterhaus, Christopher, Bosacki, Sandra L.·2022·Developmental Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dr.2022.101021

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Silent Film and Triangles tasks are reliable and valid indicators of theory of mind for this age range.

    “the tasks are reliable measures of ToM as indicated by strong test -retest reliability (e.g., Devine & Hughes, 2016) and are valid indictors of ToM as indicated by convergent validity with other advanced measures such as the Strange Stories task (e.g., Devine et al., 2024)”
  • In middle childhood and adolescence, ToM is moderately associated with language skills, regardless of the type of ToM task.

    “Similarly, in middle childhood and adolescence, ToM is moderately associated with language skills, regardless of the type of ToM task (Osterhaus & Bosacki, 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osterhaus, C., & Bosacki, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Vechta (DE)
  • Brock University (CA)
Corresponding author
Osterhaus, Christopher
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
64
Pages
101021
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220992060
Cited by
94
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
false belief understanding, second-order false belief, facial expression decoding, social cognition, language skills, executive function, inhibition, empathy, individual differences, lifespan development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review