Cited by 18Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsAnimal testing and alternativesMicrobial infections and disease research

Cell banking for pharmaceutical research

Wrigley, Jonathan D., McCall, Eileen J., Bannaghan, Claire L., Liggins, Laura, Kendrick, Clare, Griffen, Alison, Hicks, Ryan, Fröderberg-Roth, Linda·2014·Drug Discovery Today

Abstract

The provision of high-quality eukaryotic cells through robust cell banking processes is essential for the progression of drug discovery projects throughout the pharmaceutical research process. Numerous models exist to meet this aim, and this review describes many of the underlying principles, challenges and opportunities as well as detailing how these have been addressed within AstraZeneca. Crucial aspects discussed include cell line acquisition, cell bank generation, cryopreservation, storage, tracking and distribution. Because quality assurance underpins much of the process, quality control (QC) testing including mycoplasma screening and cell line authentication are also discussed in detail. Furthermore, because many of the underlying principles of cell banking are applicable in non-pharmaceutical settings, it is hoped that this review will prove a useful resource across the wider scientific community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.05.006

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STR profiling is well established with standard protocols published by the American National Standards Institute, relatively inexpensive, and flexible.

    “Adopted by pharmaceutical companies and academia for the characterization of primary and immortalized cells [11,19], STR profiling is well established with standard protocols published by the American National Standards Institute (”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wrigley, J. D., McCall, E. J., Bannaghan, C. L., Liggins, L., Kendrick, C., Griffen, A., Hicks, R., & Fröderberg-Roth, L.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
Corresponding author
Wrigley, Jonathan D.
Venue
Drug Discovery Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
1518-1529
ISSN
1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016439976
Cited by
18
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
cell banking, cryopreservation, cell line authentication, quality control, drug discovery, AstraZeneca
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Humans, Specimen Handling, Biological Specimen Banks, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review