Cited by 37Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Motivational interviewing to reduce substance-related consequences: Effects for incarcerated adolescents with depressed mood

Open access
Stein, L.A.R., Clair, Mary, Lebeau, Rebecca, Colby, Suzanne M., Barnett, Nancy P., Golembeske, Charles, Monti, Peter M.·2011·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background The impact of depressed mood on Motivational Interviewing (MI) to reduce risky behaviors and consequences in incarcerated adolescents was examined in this brief report.Methods Adolescents (N=189) were randomly assigned to receive MI or Relaxation Training (RT).Results At 3-month follow-up assessment, MI significantly reduced risks associated with marijuana use, with a trend towards reducing risks associated with alcohol use. There was also a trend for depressive symptoms to be associated with reduced risks after release. Interaction effects were non-significant, indicating no moderating effects for depressed mood on treatment outcome.Conclusions MI may be a useful treatment for incarcerated adolescents in order to reduce risks and consequences associated with substance use after release.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.023

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, L. A. R., Clair, M., Lebeau, R., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Golembeske, C., & Monti, P. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Stein, L.A.R.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
118
Issue
2-3
Pages
475-478
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040728993
Cited by
37
References
24
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 13375, R01-18851)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA013375, R01DA018851)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
motivational interviewing, incarcerated adolescents, depressive mood, substance use, cannabis use, alcohol consumption, relaxation training
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Prisoners, Relaxation Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review