Cited by 38Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Peak ages of risk for starting nonmedical use of prescription stimulants

Open access
Austic, E.A.·2015·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background To produce population-level, year- and age-specific risk estimates of first time nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among young people in the United States.Methods Data are from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health 2004-2012; a nationally representative probability sample survey administered each year. Subpopulations included youths aged 12 to 21 years (n=240,160) who had not used prescription stimulants nonmedically prior to their year of survey assessment. A meta-analytic approach was used to produce population-level age-, year-, and cohort-specific risk estimates of first time nonmedical use of prescription stimulants.Results Peak risk of starting nonmedical use of prescription stimulants was concentrated between ages 16 and 19 years, when an estimated 0.7% to 0.8% of young people reported nonmedical use of these medicines for the first time in the past twelve months. Smaller risk estimates ranging from 0.1% to 0.6% were observed at ages 12 to 15 years and 20 to 21 years. Compared with males, females were more likely to have started nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (odds ratio=1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.62), particularly between the ages of 14 and 19. Females showed a peak annual incidence rate of 1% at age 18, while males the same age showed an incidence rate of 0.5%.Conclusions Peak annual incidence rates for nonmedical use of prescription stimulants were observed between the ages of 16 and 19 years. There is reason to initiate interventions during the earlier adolescent years to prevent youths from starting nonmedical use of prescription stimulants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.034

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kroutil L Colliver J Gfroerer J 2010 Age and Cohort Patterns of Substance Use Among Adolescents. OAS Data Review (Office of Applied Studies) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administratio Rockville, MD 1 9
  2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) Methodological Resource Book Rockville, MD 30199189

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Austic, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Austic, E.A.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
152
Pages
224-229
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068591622
Cited by
38
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 7
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2016-02-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000433)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K05DA015799, R01DA016558, T32DA021129, T32DA007267, R01DA024678, R01DA036541, R01DA031160)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
stimulant medication, adolescents, young adults, age-specific risk, sex differences, substance use prevention, National Survey on Drug Use and Health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Self Medication, United States, Incidence, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review