Cited by 120Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

AUDIT and AUDIT-C as screening instruments for alcohol problem use in adolescents

Open access
Liskola, Joni, Haravuori, Henna, Lindberg, Nina, Niemelä, Solja, Karlsson, Linnea, Kiviruusu, Olli, Marttunen, Mauri·2018·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is commonly used in adults to screen for harmful alcohol consumption but few studies exist on its use among adolescents. Our aim was to validate the AUDIT and its derivative consumption questionnaire (AUDIT-C) as screening instruments for the detection of problem use of alcohol in adolescents.Methods 621 adolescents (age-range, 12-19 years) were drawn from clinical and population samples who completed the AUDIT questionnaire. Psychiatric diagnoses were assessed using K-SADS-PL. A rating based on the K-SADS-PL was used to assess alcohol use habits, alcohol use disorders, screening and symptom criteria questions. Screening performance of the AUDIT and AUDIT-C sum scores and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. The diagnostic odds ratios (dOR) were calculated to express the overall discrimination between cut-offs.Results Comparisons of ROC between the AUDIT and AUDIT-C pairs indicated a slightly better test performance by AUDIT for the whole sample and in a proportion of the subsamples. Optimal cut-off value for the AUDIT was ≥5 (sensitivity 0.931, specificity 0.772, dOR 45.22; 95% CI: 24.72-83.57) for detecting alcohol problem use. The corresponding optimal cut-off value for the AUDIT-C was ≥3 in detecting alcohol problem use (sensitivity 0.952, specificity 0.663, dOR 39.31; 95% CI: 19.46-78.97). Agreement between the AUDIT and AUDIT-C using these cut-off scores was high at 91.9%.Conclusions Our results for the cut-off scores for the early detection of alcohol problem use in adolescents are ≥5 for AUDIT, and ≥3 for AUDIT-C.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.04.015

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Babor, T.F., Higgins-Biddle, J.C., Saunders, J.B., Monteiro, M.G. (Eds.), 2001. AUDIT-The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Health Care, 2nd ed. World Health Organisation, Geneva.
  2. W.J, Conover (Ed.), 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liskola, J., Haravuori, H., Lindberg, N., Niemelä, S., Karlsson, L., Kiviruusu, O., & Marttunen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Lapland Central Hospital (FI)
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
Corresponding author
Liskola, Joni
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
188
Pages
266-273
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804938170
Cited by
120
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • WOS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
auditing, AUDIT-C, alcohol use disorder screening, adolescent alcohol use, screening tool validation, cut-off values, diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity and specificity, K-SADS-PL
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alcoholism, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review