Cited by 13HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Patterns of illicit drug use in NSW, Australia following a reduction in heroin supply

Degenhardt, Louisa, Day, Carolyn, Gilmour, Stuart, Hall, Wayne·2005·International Journal of Drug Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.05.008

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Degenhardt, L., Day, C., Gilmour, S., & Hall, W.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Degenhardt, Louisa
Venue
International Journal of Drug Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
300-307
ISSN
0955-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980062858
Cited by
13
References
32
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Drug Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
heroin shortage, illicit drug use trends, cocaine use, methamphetamine use, drug substitution, people who inject drugs, needle exchange programs, drug policy, New South Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review