Cited by 81Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionDigital Media Forensic Detection

Robust image hashing using non-uniform sampling in discrete Fourier domain

Qin, Chuan, Chang, Chin-Chen, Tsou, Pei-Ling·2013·Digital Signal Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dsp.2012.11.002

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qin, C., Chang, C.-C., & Tsou, P.-L.
Affiliations
  • University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN)
  • Asia University (TW)
  • Feng Chia University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Chin-Chen
Venue
Digital Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
578-585
ISSN
1051-2004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992919533
Cited by
81
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Digital Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
image hashing, non-uniform sampling, discrete Fourier transform, image authentication, image retrieval, collision resistance, secret key

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review