Cited by 107Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionDigital Media Forensic Detection

Perceptual image hashing based on virtual watermark detection

Khelifi, F., Jianmin Jiang·2010·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

This paper proposes a new robust and secure perceptual image hashing technique based on virtual watermark detection. The idea is justified by the fact that the watermark detector responds similarly to perceptually close images using a non embedded watermark. The hash values are extracted in binary form with a perfect control over the probability distribution of the hash bits. Moreover, a key is used to generate pseudo-random noise whose real values contribute to the randomness of the feature vector with a significantly increased uncertainty of the adversary, measured by mutual information, in comparison with linear correlation. Experimentally, the proposed technique has been shown to outperform related state-of-the art techniques recently proposed in the literature in terms of robustness with respect to image processing manipulations and geometric attacks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2009.2038637

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khelifi, F., & Jiang, J.
Affiliations
University of Bradford (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2010-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
981-994
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2129908817
Cited by
107
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
perceptual image hashing, pseudo-random noise, mutual information, geometric attacks, image forensics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review