CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36Online Learning and AnalyticsCustomer churn and segmentationEvasion and Academic Success Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Redefining profit metrics for boosting student retention in higher education

Maldonado, Sebastián, Miranda, Jaime, Olaya, Diego, Vásquez, Jonathan, Verbeke, Wouter·2021·Decision Support Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113493
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113493

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Coussement, 2020, Predicting student dropout in subscription-based online learning environments: the beneficial impact of the logit leaf model, Decis. Support. Syst., 135, 113325, 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113325 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Delen, 2020, Development of a bayesian belief network-based dss for predicting and understanding freshmen student attrition, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 281, 575, 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.037 · DOI
  3. Sutter, 2017, Predicting college students’ intention to graduate: a test of the theory of planned behavior, Coll. Stud. J., 50, 409
  4. Dejaeger, 2012, Gaining insight into student satisfaction using comprehensible data mining techniques, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 218, 548, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.022 · DOI
  5. Masci, 2018, Student and school performance across countries: a machine learning approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 269, 1072, 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.031 · DOI
  6. Miguéis, 2018, Early segmentation of students according to their academic performance: a predictive modelling approach, Decis. Support. Syst., 115, 36, 10.1016/j.dss.2018.09.001 · DOI
  7. Delen, 2011, Predicting student attrition with data mining methods, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13, 17, 10.2190/CS.13.1.b · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hand, 2009, Measuring classifier performance: a coherent alternative to the area under the roc curve, Mach. Learn., 77, 103, 10.1007/s10994-009-5119-5 · DOI
  9. Verbeke, 2012, New insights into churn prediction in the telecommunication sector: a profit driven data mining approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 218, 211, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.031 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Braxton, 1997, Appraising tinto’s theory of college student departure, Higher Education-New York-Agathon Press Incorporated, 12, 107
  11. Bean, 1980, Dropouts and turnover: the synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition, Res. High. Educ., 12, 155, 10.1007/BF00976194 · DOI
  12. Spady, 1970, Dropouts from higher education: an interdisciplinary review and synthesis, Interchange, 1, 64, 10.1007/BF02214313 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Tinto, 1975, Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research, Rev. Educ. Res., 45, 89, 10.3102/00346543045001089 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Tinto, 1982, Limits of theory and practice in student attrition, J. High. Educ., 53, 687, 10.1080/00221546.1982.11780504 · DOI
  15. Kehm, 2019, Student dropout from universities in europe: a review of empirical literature, Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 9, 147, 10.1556/063.9.2019.1.18 · DOI
  16. Lillard, 2001, Higher standards, more dropouts? Evidence within and across time, Econ. Educ. Rev., 20, 459, 10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00022-4 · DOI
  17. Aulck, 2016, Predicting student dropout in higher education, Preprint arXiv, 1606.06364 · arXiv
  18. Caison, 2007, Analysis of institutionally specific retention research: a comparison between survey and institutional database methods, Res. High. Educ., 48, 435, 10.1007/s11162-006-9032-5 · DOI
  19. Mallette, 1991, Determinants of withdrawal behavior: an exploratory study, Res. High. Educ., 32, 179, 10.1007/BF00974436 · DOI
  20. Yu, 2010, A data mining approach for identifying predictors of student retention from sophomore to junior year, Journal of Data Science, 8, 307, 10.6339/JDS.2010.08(2).574 · DOI
  21. Fortin, 2016, Nontraditional student withdrawal from undergraduate accounting programmes: a holistic perspective, Acc. Educ., 25, 437, 10.1080/09639284.2016.1193034 · DOI
  22. Ferreira, 2003, Gender issues related to graduate student attrition in two science departments, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 25, 969, 10.1080/09500690305026 · DOI
  23. Van Vonderen, 1996, Gender and doubts about study in technology: a dutch-hungarian comparison, J. Gen. Psychol., 123, 5, 10.1080/00221309.1996.9921255 · DOI
  24. Magdalena, 2016, An adaptation of tinto’s attrition model to the universidad católica de la santísima concepción, chile, Argos, 33
  25. Chaplot, 2015, Predicting student attrition in moocs using sentiment analysis and neural networks, in: AIED workshops, Vol., 53, 54
  26. Sangodiah, 2015, Minimizing student attrition in higher learning institutions in Malaysia using support vector machine, Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 71
  27. Thammasiri, 2014, A critical assessment of imbalanced class distribution problem: the case of predicting freshmen student attrition, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 321, 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.046 · DOI
  28. Elbadrawy, 2016, Predicting student performance using personalized analytics, Computer, 49, 61, 10.1109/MC.2016.119 · DOI
  29. Neslin, 2006, Defection detection: measuring and understanding the predictive accuracy of customer churn models, J. Mark. Res., 43, 204, 10.1509/jmkr.43.2.204 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Verbraken, 2012, A novel profit maximizing metric for measuring classification performance of customer churn prediction models, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 25, 961, 10.1109/TKDE.2012.50 · DOI
  31. Verbraken, 2014, Development and application of consumer credit scoring models using profit-based classification measures, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 238, 505, 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Óskarsdótir, 2017, Social network analytics for churn prediction in telco: model building, evaluation and network architecture, Expert Syst. Appl., 85, 204, 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.028 · DOI
  33. Ascarza, 2016, The perils of proactive churn prevention using plan recommendations: evidence from a field experiment, J. Mark. Res., 53, 46, 10.1509/jmr.13.0483 · DOI
  34. Gupta, 2006, Modeling customer lifetime value, J. Serv. Res., 9, 139, 10.1177/1094670506293810 · DOI
  35. Delen, 2010, A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for student retention management, Decis. Support. Syst., 49, 498, 10.1016/j.dss.2010.06.003 · DOI
  36. Maldonado, 2015, Profit-based feature selection using support vector machines–general framework and an application for customer retention, Appl. Soft Comput., 35, 740, 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.058 · DOI
  37. Hoppner, 2020, S. vanden Broucke, T. Verdonck, profit driven decision trees for churn prediction, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 284, 920, 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.072 · DOI
  38. Maldonado, 2020, Profit-based churn prediction based on minimax probability machines, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 284, 273, 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.12.007 · DOI
  39. Chawla, 2002, Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique, J. Artif. Intell. Res., 16, 321, 10.1613/jair.953 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Verbeke, 2012, New insights into churn prediction in the telecommunication sector: a profit driven data mining approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 218, 211, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.031 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Bravo, 2013, Methodologies for granting and managing loans for micro-entrepreneurs: new developments and practical experiences, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 227, 358, 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.040 · DOI
  42. Olaya, 2020, Uplift modeling for preventing student dropout in higher education, Decis. Support. Syst., 134, 113320, 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113320 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maldonado, S., Miranda, J., Olaya, D., Vásquez, J., & Verbeke, W.
Affiliations
  • Complex Engineering System Institute (CL)
  • University of Chile (CL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • University of Valparaíso (CL)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Olaya, Diego
ORCID
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
143
Pages
113493
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.dss.2021.113493
OpenAlex
W3118623680
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
  • Innoviris
  • Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
Keywords
student dropout prediction, student retention, resource allocation, higher education, tutorial program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review