Cited by 125Online Learning and AnalyticsCustomer churn and segmentationEvasion and Academic Success Factors

Predicting student dropout in subscription-based online learning environments: the beneficial impact of the logit leaf model

Open access
Coussement, Kristof, Phan, Minh, De Caigny, Arno, Benoit, Dries F., Raes, Annelies·2020·Decision Support Systems

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113325

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent developments in predicting student attrition propose the use of data acquired from disparate sources in addition to more sophisticated algorithms such as deep feed-forward neural networks and hybrid logit leaf model.

    “Recent developments in predicting student attrition propose the use of data acquired from disparate sources in addition to more sophisticated algorithms such as deep feed-forward neural networks (Imran et al., 2019) and hybrid logit leaf model (Coussement et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. A. Ghazal, T. Rabl, M. Hu, F. Raab, M. Poess, A. Crolotte, H.A. Jacobsen, BigBench: Towards an industry standard benchmark for big data analytics, Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Manag. Data. 36 (2013) 1197-1208.
  2. G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, R. Tibishirani, An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R (older version), Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2013.
  3. J. Whitehill, J.J. Williams, G. Lopez, C.A. Coleman, J. Reich, Beyond Prediction: First Steps Toward Automatic Intervention in MOOC Student Stopout, SSRN Electron. J. (2015).

Authors
Coussement, K., Phan, M., De Caigny, A., Benoit, D. F., & Raes, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • IMEC (BE)
Corresponding author
Coussement, Kristof
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
135
Pages
113325
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3029464237
Cited by
125
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 3
FWCI
19.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Decision Support Systems (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
Keywords
student dropout prediction, student retention, model interpretability, student demographics, student engagement, at-risk students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review