Cited by 16Misinformation and Its ImpactsInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorSpam and Phishing Detection

Search & Verify: Misinformation and source evaluations in Internet search results

Dennis, Alan R., Moravec, Patricia L., Kim, Antino·2023·Decision Support Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dss.2023.113976

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dennis et al. (2023) found that users are unlikely to verify information unless they are sufficiently motivated.

    “Dennis et al. (2023) similarly found that users are unlikely to verify information unless they are sufficiently motivated.”

    From Bridging risk and retention: risk coping with privacy and hallucination in AI (2026) · cites this paper as Dennis et al. 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dennis, A. R., Moravec, P. L., & Kim, A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Dennis, Alan R.
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
171
Pages
113976
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362715672
Cited by
16
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
misinformation, source evaluation, fact-checking, Wikipedia, online news credibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review