The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of the mechanical effects of plant roots on concentrated flow erosion rates
Open accessAbstract
Living plant roots modify both mechanical and hydrological characteristics of the soil matrix (e.g. soil aggregate stability by root exudates, soil cohesion, infiltration rate, soil moisture content, soil organic matter) and negatively influence the soil erodibility. During the last two decades several studies reported on the effects of plant roots in controlling concentrated flow erosion rates. However a global analysis of the now available data on root effects is still lacking. Yet, a meta-data analysis will contribute to a better understanding of the soil-root interactions as our capability to assess the effectiveness of roots in reducing soil erosion rates due to concentrated flow in different environments remains difficult. The objectives of this study are therefore: i) to provide a state of the art on studies quantifying the effectiveness of roots in reducing soil erosion rates due to concentrated flow; and ii) to explore the overall trends in erosion reduction as a function of the root (length) density, root architecture and soil texture, based on an integrated analysis of published data. We therefore compiled a dataset of measured soil detachment ratios (SDR) for the root density (RD; 822 observations) as well as for the root length density (RLD; 274 observations). A Hill curve model best describes the decrease in SDR as a function of R(L)D. An important finding of our meta-analysis is that RLD is a much more suitable variable to estimate SDR compared to RD as it is linked to root architecture. However, a large proportion of the variability in SDR could not be attributed to RD or RLD, resulting in a low predictive accuracy of these Hill curve models with a model efficiency of 0.11 and 0.17 for RD and RLD respectively. Considering root architecture and soil texture did yield a better predictive model for RLD with a model efficiency of 0.37 for fibrous roots in non-sandy soils while no improvement was found for RD. The unexplained variance is attributed to differences in experimental set-ups and measuring errors which could not be explicitly accounted for due to a lack of additional data. Based on those results, it remains difficult to predict the effects of roots on soil erosion rates. However, by using a Monte Carlo simulation approach, we were able to establish relationships that allow assessing the likely erosion-reducing effects of plant roots, while taking these uncertainties into account. Overall, this study demonstrates that plant roots can be very effective in reducing soil erosion rates due to concentrated flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.
Schiavon, S., & Zecchin, R. (2007) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 16,994
(2013) · Cited by 6,752
Soil structure and management: a review
Bronick, C. J., & Lal, R. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005 · Cited by 4,463
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves
Hill, A. V., Hill, A. L., & Hill, A. V. (1910) · The Journal of Physiology · Cited by 2,181
Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs
Poesen, J., Nachtergaele, J., Verstraeten, G., & Valentin, C. (2003) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/s0341-8162(02)00143-1 · Cited by 1,774
Self-citationCarbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface
Jones, D. L., Nguyen, C., & Finlay, R. D. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-009-9925-0 · Cited by 1,710
The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients
Hodge, A. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01015.x · Cited by 1,686
Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review
Gyssels, G., Poesen, J., Bochet, E., & Li, Y. (2005) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133305pp443ra · Cited by 1,225 · cited 4×
“As a consequence, the role of below-ground vegetation in controlling erosion processes have been less studied (Poesen et al., 2003; Gyssels et al., 2005; Reubens et al., 2007; Stokes et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Using the USLE: Chances, challenges and limitations of soil erosion modelling
Alewell, C., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., & Panagos, P. (2019) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.05.004 · Cited by 804
Metadata
- Authors
- Vannoppen, W., Vanmaercke, M., De Baets, S., & Poesen, J.
- Venue
- Earth-Science Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 666-678
- ISSN
- 0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1257934260
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 21.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the mechanical effects of plant roots on concentrated flow erosion rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.011
- The paper
- Vannoppen, W., Vanmaercke, M., De Baets, S., & Poesen, J. (2015). A review of the mechanical effects of plant roots on concentrated flow erosion rates. Earth-Science Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.