The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface
Open accessAbstract
The loss of organic and inorganic carbon from roots into soil underpins nearly all the major changes that occur in the rhizosphere. In this review we explore the mechanistic basis of organic carbon and nitrogen flow in the rhizosphere. It is clear that C and N flow in the rhizosphere is extremely complex, being highly plant and environment dependent and varying both spatially and temporally along the root. Consequently, the amount and type of rhizodeposits (e.g. exudates, border cells, mucilage) remains highly context specific. This has severely limited our capacity to quantify and model the amount of rhizodeposition in ecosystem processes such as C sequestration and nutrient acquisition. It is now evident that C and N flow at the soil–root interface is bidirectional with C and N being lost from roots and taken up from the soil simultaneously. Here we present four alternative hypotheses to explain why high and low molecular weight organic compounds are actively cycled in the rhizosphere. These include: (1) indirect, fortuitous root exudate recapture as part of the root’s C and N distribution network, (2) direct re-uptake to enhance the plant’s C efficiency and to reduce rhizosphere microbial growth and pathogen attack, (3) direct uptake to recapture organic nutrients released from soil organic matter, and (4) for inter-root and root–microbial signal exchange. Due to severe flaws in the interpretation of commonly used isotopic labelling techniques, there is still great uncertainty surrounding the importance of these individual fluxes in the rhizosphere. Due to the importance of rhizodeposition in regulating ecosystem functioning, it is critical that future research focuses on resolving the quantitative importance of the different C and N fluxes operating in the rhizosphere and the ways in which these vary spatially and temporally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems
GILL, R. A., & JACKSON, R. B. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x · Cited by 1,300
Rhizosphere communication of plants, parasitic plants and AM fungi
Bouwmeester, H. J., Roux, C., Lopez-Raez, J. A., & Bécard, G. (2007) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.009 · Cited by 486
BODDY, E., HILL, P., FARRAR, J., & JONES, D. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.09.030 · Cited by 251
Self-citationMolecular communication in the rhizosphere
Faure, D., Vereecke, D., & Leveau, J. H. J. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9839-2 · Cited by 199
Ford, C. R., Wurzburger, N., Hendrick, R. L., & Teskey, R. O. (2007) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/27.3.375 · Cited by 66
Cited by
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Compant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 · Cited by 2,318
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
Role of organic amendments on enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal (loid) contaminated soils
Park, J. H., Lamb, D., Paneerselvam, P., Choppala, G., Bolan, N., & Chung, J.-W. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.082 · Cited by 936
Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input
Sokol, N. W., & Bradford, M. A. (2019) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0258-6 · Cited by 891
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, D. L., Nguyen, C., & Finlay, R. D.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2009-02-25
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 5-33
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2112998801
- Cited by
- 1,710
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 64.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11104-009-9925-0
- The paper
- Jones, D. L., Nguyen, C., & Finlay, R. D. (2009). Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9925-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.