The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Remote Sensing for Water Quality Retrieval: Progress and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Water pollution has become one of the most serious issues threatening water environments, water as a resource and human health. The most urgent and effective measures rely on dynamic and accurate water quality monitoring on a large scale. Due to their temporal and spatial advantages, remote sensing technologies have been widely used to retrieve water quality data. With the development of hyper-spectral sensors, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and artificial intelligence, there has been significant advancement in remotely sensed water quality retrieval owing to various data availabilities and retrieval methodologies. This article presents the application of remote sensing for water quality retrieval, and mainly discusses the research progress in terms of data sources and retrieval modes. In particular, we summarize some retrieval algorithms for several specific water quality variables, including total suspended matter (TSM), chlorophyll-a (Chl–a), colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP). We also discuss the significant challenges to atmospheric correction, remotely sensed data resolution, and retrieval model applicability in the domains of spatial, temporal and water complexity. Finally, we propose possible solutions to these challenges. The review can provide detailed references for future development and research in water quality retrieval.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 · Cited by 5,673
Gitelson, A. A., Gritz †, Y., & Merzlyak, M. N. (2003) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1078/0176-1617-00887 · Cited by 2,683
Schindler, D. W. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.195.4275.260 · Cited by 2,623
Gao, F., Masek, J., Schwaller, M., & Hall, F. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2006.872081 · Cited by 1,968
The relative influences of nitrogen and phosphorus on oceanic primary production
Tyrrell, T. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22941 · Cited by 1,687
The phosphorus‐chlorophyll relationship in lakes1,2
Dillon, P. J., & Rigler, F. H. (1974) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1974.19.5.0767 · Cited by 1,215
New refinements and validation of the MODIS Land-Surface Temperature/Emissivity products
WAN, Z. (2008) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.026 · Cited by 1,214
A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques
Gholizadeh, M., Melesse, A., & Reddi, L. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16081298 · Cited by 1,122
Remote sensing of inland waters: Challenges, progress and future directions
Palmer, S. C. J., Kutser, T., & Hunter, P. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.021 · Cited by 791
Cited by
Adjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., James, D., & Ahmad, S. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15143534 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, H., Kong, J., Hu, H., Du, Y., Gao, M., & Chen, F.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-04-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1770
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4224220357
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 21.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Remote Sensing for Water Quality Retrieval: Progress and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs14081770
- The paper
- Yang, H., Kong, J., Hu, H., Du, Y., Gao, M., & Chen, F. (2022). A Review of Remote Sensing for Water Quality Retrieval: Progress and Challenges. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14081770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
