Cited by 129Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The impact of social media use on body image and disordered eating behaviors: Content matters more than duration of exposure

Open access
Sanzari, Christina M., Gorrell, Sasha, Anderson, Lisa M., Reilly, Erin E., Niemiec, Martha A., Orloff, Natalia C., Anderson, Drew A., Hormes, Julia M.·2023·Eating Behaviors

Abstract

Social media use is rapidly expanding in terms of frequency, duration, and the diversity of platforms available. Given evidence for associations between social media use, body image disturbances, and disordered eating it is important to identify potentially harmful aspects of social media use that could serve as intervention targets. This study surveyed two demographically diverse undergraduate student cohorts in 2015 and 2022 to compare patterns in social media use, body image, and disordered eating behaviors between samples, including as a function of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to test the hypothesized moderating role of specific content consumed in the association between social media use and maladaptive outcomes. Participants in 2022 reported greater body image disturbances, more frequent vomiting and laxative use, and more time spent on a greater number of social media accounts, with significantly greater use of image-based platforms such as Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube. Moderated regression analyses suggest that type of content consumed, but not the amount of time spent on social media or diversity of platforms utilized, is associated with body image disturbances and disordered eating behaviors after controlling for gender and body mass index. Specifically, exposure to weight loss content was associated with lower body appreciation, greater fears of negative appearance evaluation, and more frequent binge eating. Contrary to initial hypotheses, exposure to body positivity/neutrality content did not have protective effects. Findings suggest that interventions targeting negative consequences of social media use should focus on addressing content consumed, rather than time spent on social media platforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101722

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher use of social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok that allow adolescents to engage with photo and video-related activities is associated with higher levels of body image and eating concerns, rather than global time spent on social media.

    “Other recent studies have also put forward that a higher use of social media platforms such as Instragram and TikTok that allow adolescents to engage with photo and video-related activities appears to be associated with higher levels of body image and eating concerns, rather than a global time spent on social media (Sanzari et al., 2023;Zimmer-Gembeck et al., 2021).”

    From Relation Between Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns and Disordered Eating in Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Sanzari et al., 2023

    The Discussion and Conclusion report that exposure to weight-loss content was associated with poorer body image and disordered eating, while time spent on social media was generally unrelated to those outcomes. But the study examined undergraduate students, not adolescents, and does not establish that greater use of Instagram or TikTok itself was associated with greater concerns. The relevant distinction is content viewed versus time spent, not platform use versus time spent. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanzari, C. M., Gorrell, S., Anderson, L. M., Reilly, E. E., Niemiec, M. A., Orloff, N. C., Anderson, D. A., & Hormes, J. M.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Sanzari, Christina M.
Venue
Eating Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
49
Pages
101722
ISSN
1471-0153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362574866
Cited by
129
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1
FWCI
37.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eating Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH123910, K23MH126201, K23MH131871)
  • National Science Foundation (1645421)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media use, body image, disordered eating, binge eating, image-based social media, COVID-19 pandemic, body appreciation, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Humans, Pandemics, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review