Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gut Microbiota Linked to Sexual Preference and HIV Infection

Open access
Noguera-Julian, Marc, Rocafort, Muntsa, Guillén, Yolanda, Rivera, Javier, Casadellà, Maria, Nowak, Piotr, Hildebrand, Falk, Zeller, Georg, Parera, Mariona, Bellido, Rocío, Rodríguez, Cristina, Carrillo, Jorge, Mothe, Beatriz, Coll, Josep, Bravo, Isabel, Estany, Carla, Herrero, Cristina, Saz, Jorge, Sirera, Guillem, Torrela, Ariadna, Navarro, Jordi, Crespo, Manel, Brander, Christian, Negredo, Eugènia, Blanco, Julià, Guarner, Francisco, Calle, Maria Luz, Bork, Peer, Sönnerborg, Anders, Clotet, Bonaventura, Paredes, Roger·2016·EBioMedicine

Abstract

The precise effects of HIV-1 on the gut microbiome are unclear. Initial cross-sectional studies provided contradictory associations between microbial richness and HIV serostatus and suggested shifts from Bacteroides to Prevotella predominance following HIV-1 infection, which have not been found in animal models or in studies matched for HIV-1 transmission groups. In two independent cohorts of HIV-1-infected subjects and HIV-1-negative controls in Barcelona (n = 156) and Stockholm (n = 84), men who have sex with men (MSM) predominantly belonged to the Prevotella-rich enterotype whereas most non-MSM subjects were enriched in Bacteroides, independently of HIV-1 status, and with only a limited contribution of diet effects. Moreover, MSM had a significantly richer and more diverse fecal microbiota than non-MSM individuals. After stratifying for sexual orientation, there was no solid evidence of an HIV-specific dysbiosis. However, HIV-1 infection remained consistently associated with reduced bacterial richness, the lowest bacterial richness being observed in subjects with a virological-immune discordant response to antiretroviral therapy. Our findings indicate that HIV gut microbiome studies must control for HIV risk factors and suggest interventions on gut bacterial richness as possible novel avenues to improve HIV-1-associated immune dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.032

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Noguera-Julian, M., Rocafort, M., Guillén, Y., Rivera, J., Casadellà, M., Nowak, P., Hildebrand, F., Zeller, G., Parera, M., Bellido, R., Rodríguez, C., Carrillo, J., Mothe, B., Coll, J., Bravo, I., Estany, C., Herrero, C., Saz, J., Sirera, G., Torrela, A., Navarro, J., Crespo, M., Brander, C., Negredo, E., Blanco, J., Guarner, F., Calle, M. L., Bork, P., Sönnerborg, A., Clotet, B., & Paredes, R.
Venue
EBioMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
5
Pages
135-146
ISSN
2352-3964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2271249372
Cited by
445
References
31
FWCI
22.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gut Microbiota Linked to Sexual Preference and HIV Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.032
The paper
Noguera-Julian, M., Rocafort, M., Guillén, Y., Rivera, J., Casadellà, M., Nowak, P., Hildebrand, F., Zeller, G., Parera, M., Bellido, R., Rodríguez, C., Carrillo, J., Mothe, B., Coll, J., Bravo, I., Estany, C., Herrero, C., Saz, J., Sirera, G., . . . Paredes, R. (2016). Gut Microbiota Linked to Sexual Preference and HIV Infection. EBioMedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.