Cited by 12Simulation-Based Education in HealthcarePatient Safety and Medication ErrorsInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

Undergraduate Health Professional Students’ Team Communication in Simulated Emergency Settings: A Scoping Review

Bourke, Sharon L., Cooper, Simon, Lam, Louisa, McKenna, Lisa·2021·Clinical Simulation in Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.07.004

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bourke, S. L., Cooper, S., Lam, L., & McKenna, L.
Affiliations
  • Federation University (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bourke, Sharon L.
Venue
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
60
Pages
42-63
ISSN
1876-1399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3194467080
Cited by
12
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Simulation in Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
team communication, teamwork, simulation-based education, non-technical skills, medical errors, student self-confidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review