Cited by 28Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsInnovations in Medical Education

Effects of Experiential Learning Simulation-Based Learning Program on Clinical Judgment Among Obstetric Nursing Students

Uppor, Wassana, Klunklin, Areewan, Viseskul, Nongkran, Skulphan, Sombat·2024·Clinical Simulation in Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101553

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uppor, W., Klunklin, A., Viseskul, N., & Skulphan, S.
Affiliations
  • Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Suphanburi (TH)
  • Panyapiwat Institute of Management (TH)
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
Corresponding author
Klunklin, Areewan
Venue
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
92
Pages
101553
ISSN
1876-1399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399068581
Cited by
22
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Simulation in Nursing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
clinical judgment, simulation-based training, experiential learning, Kolb's experiential learning theory, nursing education, clinical scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review