Cited by 207Innovations in Medical EducationSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareProblem and Project Based Learning

Implementing Kolb´s Experiential Learning Cycle by Linking Real Experience, Case-Based Discussion and Simulation

Open access
Wijnen-Meijer, M., Brandhuber, T., Schneider, A., Berberat, P.O.·2022·Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Background: To prepare medical students for their future, they must become acquainted with clinical practice, for example by means of simulations, clerkships and discussing patient cases. By connecting these different approaches, according to Kolb´s experiential learning cycle, the learning effect can be strengthened. Methodology: In the development of a didactical program for students who are being prepared for their role as general practitioners, we have adopted a new didactic approach, in which educational formats are interlinked, according to Kolb´s experiential learning cycle. The content of these courses is determined by the Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for the clerkship in family medicine, combined with the most common chief complaints of patients in the GP's practice. In 2019, the first course was implemented at the Technical University of Munich, Germany, with 6 medical students. A first seminar discusses patients who the students have seen for themselves during their clerkship in family medicine. In addition, matching theory is discussed and skills are practiced. In the next seminar, students apply the acquired knowledge and skills in scenarios with standardized patients. Students evaluated the courses as positive. The evaluations show they find discussing personally experienced patient cases and the opportunity to practice very valuable. Conclusions: A course design according to Kolb's Experiential learning cycle, which integrates experience, theory and simulation, is a valuable addition to existing forms of teaching in medical education. Students appreciated both discussing personally experienced patient cases and the opportunity to re-practice similar cases in a simulated environment. To gain more insight into the learning effects, it is recommended to further explore this approach in a different context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/23821205221091511

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1]Ten Cate O Custers EJFM Durning SJ. Principles and practice of case-based clinical reasoning education: A method for preclinical students. Springer International Publishing AG; 2017. 31314234
  2. [2]Motola I Devine LA Chung HS Sullivan JE Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No.82. Med Teach. 2013; 35(10): e1511- e1530. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632 23941678 · DOI
  3. [4]Crosskerry P. A model for clinical decision-making in medicine. Med Sci Educ. 2018; 27: 9- 13. 10.1007/s40670-017-0499-9 · DOI
  4. [5]Torre DM Hernandez CA Castiglioni A, et al. The clinical reasoning mapping exercise (CResME): a new tool for exploring clinical reasoning. Perspect Med Educ. 2019; 8: 47- 51. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0493-y 30666584 PMC6382623 · DOI
  5. [7]Marker S Mohr M Østergaard D. Simulation-based training of junior doctors in handling critically ill patients facilitates the transition to clinical practice: an interview study. BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19: 11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1447-0 30621668 PMC6323692 · DOI
  6. [8]Liljedahl M. On learning in the clinical environment. Perspect Med Educ. 2018; 7: 272- 275. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0441-x 29992437 PMC6086815 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [9]Ramani S Leinster SJ. Teaching in the clinical environment AMEE guide no.34. Med Teach. 2008; 30(4): 347- 364. doi: 10.1080/01421590802061613 18569655 · DOI
  8. [10]Chen CH Van den Broek WES Ten Cate O. The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2015; 90(4): 431- 436. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000586 25470310 · DOI
  9. [11]Ten Cate O. A primer on entrustable professional activities. Korean J Med Educ. 2018; 30(1): 1- 10. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2018.76 29510603 PMC5840559 · DOI
  10. [12]Ten Cate O Graafmans L Posthumus I Welink L van Dijk M. The EPA-based Utrecht undergraduate clinical curriculum: development and implementation. Med Teach. 2018; 40(5): 506- 513. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1435856 29468913 · DOI
  11. [13]Berberat PO Rotthoff R Baerwald C, et al. Entrustable professional activities in final year undergraduate medical training – advancement of the final year training logbook in Germany. GMS J Med Educ. 2019; 36(5): Doc70. doi: 10.3205/zma001278 31844642 PMC6905355 · DOI
  12. [14]Brauer DG Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE guide No. 96. Med Teach. 2015; 37(4): 312- 322. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.970998 25319403 · DOI
  13. [15]Kolb DA. Experiental learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall; 1984.
  14. [16]Herzog T Brandhuber T Barth N, et al. „Beste Landpartie Allgemeinmedizin“ (BeLA) – ein didaktisches Konzept gegen den Hausärztemangel auf dem land. Z Allgemeinmed. 2019. doi: 10.3238/zfa.2019.0356-0359. [in German]. · DOI
  15. [17]Korthagen FAJ Kessels J Koster B Wubbels T Lagerwerf B. Linking theory and practice: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Routledge; 2001.
  16. [18]David A Wyrick PE Hilsen L. Using Kolb´s cycle to round out learning. ASEE Annual Conference 2002; 10.18260/1-2—10828. · DOI
  17. [19]Abdulwahed M Nagy ZK. Applying Kolb´s experiental learning cycle for laboratory education. J Eng Educ. 2009; 98(3): 283- 294. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01025.x · DOI
  18. [20]Hattie J. Visible learning. Routledge; 2009.
  19. [21]Salomon G Perkins DN. Rocky roads to transfer: rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educ Psychol. 1989; 24: 113- 142. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2402_1 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Wijnen-Meijer, M., Brandhuber, T., Schneider, A., & Berberat, P. O.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Venue
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Published
2022-01
Volume
9
Pages
23821205221091511-23821205221091511
ISSN
2382-1205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281251436
Cited by
207
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
Kolb's learning cycle, medical education, case-based discussion, standardized patients, simulation-based training, entrustable professional activities, matching theory, curriculum development, medical students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review