Cited by 37Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

Enhancing learning outcomes through AI-driven simulation in nursing education: A systematic review

Sengul, Tuba, Sarıköse, Seda·2025·Clinical Simulation in Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101797

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sengul, T., & Sarıköse, S.
Affiliations
Koç University (TR)
Corresponding author
Sarıköse, Seda
Venue
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
106
Pages
101797
ISSN
1876-1399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7077146653
Cited by
32
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 1
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Simulation in Nursing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
artificial intelligence, AI-driven simulation, simulation-based nursing education, learning outcomes, clinical reasoning, self-efficacy, empathy, student satisfaction, student engagement, communication skills, knowledge acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review