The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of co-inoculation with plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobium on the biochemical responses of alfalfa-soil system in copper contaminated soil
Abstract
The effects and regulatory mechanisms of co-inoculation of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) and rhizobium in plant-soil systems remain unclear, despite numerous reports that PGPRs or rhizobium can alleviate metal toxicity. We used the co-inoculation of the PGPR Paenibacillus mucilaginosus and the metal-resistant rhizobium Sinorhizobium meliloti for exploring the physiological and biochemical responses of the plant-soil system in metal-contaminated soil. The co-inoculation with the PGPR and rhizobium significantly increased the nutrient (N, P, and K) contents in plant tissues and promoted plant growth in soil contaminated with copper (Cu). Stress from Cu-induced reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation were largely attenuated by the co-inoculation by increasing the activities of antioxidant enzymes. The contents and uptake of Cu in plant tissues increased significantly in the co-inoculation treatment compared with the uninoculated control and individual inoculation treatment. Co-inoculation with PGPR and rhizobium significantly increased soil microbial biomass, enzymatic activities, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and soil organic matter contents compared with the uninoculated control. Interestingly, co-inoculation also affected the composition of the rhizospheric microbial community, and slightly increased rhizospheric microbial diversity. These improvements of the soil fertility and biological activity also had a beneficial impact on plant growth under Cu stress. Our results suggested that alfalfa co-inoculated with PGPR and rhizobium could increase plant growth and Cu uptake in metal-contaminated soil by alleviating plant Cu stress and improving soil biochemical properties. These results indicate that the co-application of PGPR and rhizobium can have a positive effect on the biochemical responses of alfalfa-soil systems in soil contaminated by heavy metals and can provide an efficient strategy for the phytomanagement of metal-contaminated land.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts
Heath, R. L., & Packer, L. (1968) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1 · Cited by 11,413
Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance
Mittler, R. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9 · Cited by 10,764
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture
Bhattacharyya, P. N., & Jha, D. K. (2012) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9 · Cited by 2,848
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data
Quince, C., Lanzén, A., Curtis, T. P., Davenport, R. J., Hall, N., Head, I. M., Read, L. F., & Sloan, W. T. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1361 · Cited by 1,000
Beneficial role of bacterial endophytes in heavy metal phytoremediation
Ma, Y., Rajkumar, M., Zhang, C., & Freitas, H. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.047 · Cited by 684
Soil Microbial Communities and Restoration Ecology: Facilitators or Followers?
Harris, J. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172975 · Cited by 648
Garcı́a-Gil, J. C., Plaza, C., Soler-Rovira, P., & Polo, A. (2000) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00165-6 · Cited by 642
Etesami, H. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.032 · Cited by 542
Dary, M., Chamber-Pérez, M. A., Palomares, A. J., & Pajuelo, E. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.035 · Cited by 484
Cited by
Cui, J., Zhu, Z., Xu, X., Liu, S., Jones, D. L., Kuzyakov, Y., Shibistova, O., Wu, J., & Ge, T. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107720 · Cited by 473
Sharma, J. K., Kumar, N., Singh, N. P., & Santal, A. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1076876 · Cited by 423
Plant Growth Stimulation by Microbial Consortia
Santoyo, G., Guzmán-Guzmán, P., Parra-Cota, F. I., Santos-Villalobos, S. D. L., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., & Glick, B. R. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11020219 · Cited by 363
The Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Mitigating Plant’s Environmental Stresses
Vocciante, M., Grifoni, M., Fusini, D., Petruzzelli, G., & Franchi, E. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12031231 · Cited by 316
Recent advances in phyto-combined remediation of heavy metal pollution in soil
Deng, S., Zhang, X., Zhu, Y., & Zhuo, R. (2024) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108337 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Ju, W., Liu, L., Fang, L., Cui, Y., Duan, C., & Wu, H.
- Venue
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 167
- Pages
- 218-226
- ISSN
- 0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896819968
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 19.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of co-inoculation with plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobium on the biochemical responses of alfalfa-soil system in copper contaminated soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.016
- The paper
- Ju, W., Liu, L., Fang, L., Cui, Y., Duan, C., & Wu, H. (2019). Impact of co-inoculation with plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobium on the biochemical responses of alfalfa-soil system in copper contaminated soil. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.