The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon and nitrogen recycling from microbial necromass to cope with C:N stoichiometric imbalance by priming
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The impact of increasing amounts of labile C input on priming effects (PE) on soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization remains unclear, particularly under anoxic conditions and under high C input common in microbial hotspots. PE and their mechanisms were investigated by a 60-day incubation of three flooded paddy soils amended with13C-labeled glucose equivalent to 50–500% of microbial biomass C (MBC). PE (14–55% of unamended soil) peaked at moderate glucose addition rates (i.e., 50–300% of MBC). Glucose addition above 300% of MBC suppressed SOM mineralization but intensified microbial N acquisition, which contradicted the common PE mechanism of accelerating SOM decomposition for N-supply (frequently termed as “N mining”). Particularly at glucose input rate higher than 3 g kg−1 (i.e., 300–500% of MBC), mineral N content dropped on day 2 close to zero (1.1–2.5 mg N kg−1) because of microbial N immobilization. To cope with the N limitation, microorganisms greatly increased N-acetyl glucosaminidase and leucine aminopeptidase activities, while SOM decomposition decreased. Several discrete peaks of glucose-derived CO2 (contributing >80% to total CO2) were observed between days 13–30 under high glucose input (300–500% of MBC), concurrently with CH4 peaks. Such CO2 dynamics was distinct from the common exponential decay pattern, implicating the recycling and mineralization of 13C-enriched microbial necromass driven by glucose addition. Therefore, N recycling from necromass was hypothesized as a major mechanism to alleviate microbial N deficiency without SOM priming under excess labile C input. Compound-specific 13C-PLFA confirmed the redistribution of glucose-derived C among microbial groups, i.e., necromass recycling. Following glucose input, more than 4/5 of total 13C-PLFA was in the gram-negative and some non-specific bacteria, suggesting these microorganisms as r-strategists capable of rapidly utilizing the most labile C. However, their 13C-PLFA content decreased by 70% after 60 days, probably as a result of death of these r-strategists. On the contrary, the 13C-PLFA in gram-positive bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi (K-strategists) was initially minimal but increased by 0.5–5 folds between days 2 and 60. Consequently, the necromass of dead r-strategists provided a high-quality C–N source to the K-strategists. We conclude that under severe C excess, N recycling from necromass is a much more efficient microbial strategy to cover the acute N demand than N acquisition from the recalcitrant SOM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., & Smith, G. M. (2009) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6 · Cited by 17,963
The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage
Liang, C., Schimel, J. P., & Jastrow, J. D. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105 · Cited by 3,320
Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale
Sinsabaugh, R. L., Lauber, C. L., Weintraub, M. N., Ahmed, B., Allison, S. D., Crenshaw, C., Contosta, A. R., Cusack, D., Frey, S., Gallo, M. E., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x · Cited by 2,593
Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction—an automated procedure
Wu, J., Joergensen, R. G., Pommerening, B., Chaussod, R., & Brookes, P. C. (1990) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(90)90046-3 · Cited by 2,499
Self-citationC:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?
Cleveland, C. C., & Liptzin, D. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 · Cited by 2,365
Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2771 · Cited by 2,172
Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter
Kuzyakov, Y. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.003 · Cited by 2,140
Self-citationPrinciples of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., & Mooney, H. A. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b97397 · Cited by 2,097
Stable Isotopes in Plant Ecology
Dawson, T. E., Mambelli, S., Plamboeck, A. H., Templer, P. H., & Tu, K. P. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451 · Cited by 1,947
The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition?
Fontaine, S., Mariotti, A., & Abbadie, L. (2003) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(03)00123-8 · Cited by 1,784
Cited by
Joseph, S., Cowie, A. L., Van Zwieten, L., Bolan, N., Budai, A., Buss, W., Cayuela, M. L., Graber, E. R., Ippolito, J. A., Kuzyakov, Y., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12885 · Cited by 1,090
Self-citationTemperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition is linked with a K‐selected microbial community
Li, H., Yang, S., Semenov, M. V., Yao, F., Ye, J., Bu, R., Ma, R., Lin, J., Kurganova, I., Wang, X., et al. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15593 · Cited by 537
Self-citationSoil organic matter priming: The pH effects
Wang, C., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2024) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.17349 · Cited by 382
Self-citationFrom energy to (soil organic) matter
Gunina, A., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16071 · Cited by 367
Self-citationCraig, M. E., Geyer, K. M., Beidler, K. V., Brzostek, E. R., Frey, S. D., Stuart Grandy, A., Liang, C., & Phillips, R. P. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28715-9 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Cui, J., Zhu, Z., Xu, X., Liu, S., Jones, D. L., Kuzyakov, Y., Shibistova, O., Wu, J., & Ge, T.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 142
- Pages
- 107720
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000487497
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 32.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon and nitrogen recycling from microbial necromass to cope with C:N stoichiometric imbalance by priming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107720
- The paper
- Cui, J., Zhu, Z., Xu, X., Liu, S., Jones, D. L., Kuzyakov, Y., Shibistova, O., Wu, J., & Ge, T. (2020). Carbon and nitrogen recycling from microbial necromass to cope with C:N stoichiometric imbalance by priming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.