Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How many microplastics do you need to (sub)sample?

Cowger, Win, Markley, Laura A.T., Moore, Shelly, Gray, Andrew B., Upadhyay, Kshitij, Koelmans, Albert A.·2024·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116243
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116243

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Astray, 2023, Machine learning to predict the adsorption capacity of microplastics, Nanomaterials, 13, 1061, 10.3390/nano13061061 · DOI
  2. Brandt, 2021, Assessment of subsampling strategies in microspectroscopy of environmental microplastic samples, Front. Environ. Sci., 8, 10.3389/fenvs.2020.579676 · DOI
  3. Chevalier, 2020, Pollen-based climate reconstruction techniques for late Quaternary studies, Earth-Sci. Rev., 210, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103384 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cid-Samamed, 2023, Recent advances in the aggregation behavior of nanoplastics in aquatic systems, IJMS, 24, 13995, 10.3390/ijms241813995 · DOI
  5. Cowger, 2020, Critical review of processing and classification techniques for images and spectra in microplastic research, Appl. Spectrosc., 74, 10.1177/0003702820929064 · DOI
  6. Cowger, 2021, Concentration depth profiles of microplastic particles in river flow and implications for surface sampling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 6032, 10.1021/acs.est.1c01768 · DOI
  7. Cowger, 2022, Estimating floating macroplastic flux in the Santa Ana River, California, J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud., 44
  8. Cowger, 2024, Generation of macro- and microplastic databases by high-throughput FTIR analysis with microplate readers, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 10.1007/s00216-024-05127-w · DOI
  9. De Frond, 2023, Representative subsampling methods for the chemical identification of microplastic particles in environmental samples, Chemosphere, 310, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136772 · DOI
  10. De Lange, 2023, Sample size requirements for riverbank macrolitter characterization, Front. Water, 4, 10.3389/frwa.2022.1085285 · DOI
  11. Eaton, 2019, Percentile-based grain size distribution analysis tools (GSDtools) – estimating confidence limits and hypothesis tests for comparing two samples, Earth Surf. Dyn., 7, 789, 10.5194/esurf-7-789-2019 · DOI
  12. El Khatib, 2023, Assessment of filter subsampling and extrapolation for quantifying microplastics in environmental samples using Raman spectroscopy, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 192, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115073 · DOI
  13. Eriksen, 2023, A growing plastic smog, now estimated to be over 170 trillion plastic particles afloat in the world’s oceans—urgent solutions required, PLoS One, 18, 10.1371/journal.pone.0281596 · DOI
  14. Guo, 2021, Global meta-analysis of microplastic contamination in reservoirs with a novel framework, Water Res., 207, 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117828 · DOI
  15. Karlsson, 2020, Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res, 27, 5559, 10.1007/s11356-019-07274-5 · DOI
  16. Koelmans, 2019, Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality, Water Res, 155, 410, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.054 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kooi, 2021, Characterizing the multidimensionality of microplastics across environmental compartments, Water Res, 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117429 · DOI
  18. Martí, 2020, The colors of the ocean plastics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 6594, 10.1021/acs.est.9b06400 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Miller, 2017, Mountains to the sea: River study of plastic and non-plastic microfiber pollution in the northeast USA, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 124, 245, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.028 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Mintenig, 2020, A systems approach to understand microplastic occurrence and variability in Dutch riverine surface waters, Water Res., 176, 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115723 · DOI
  21. Moore, 2011, Quantity and type of plastic debris flowing from two urban rivers to coastal waters and beaches of Southern California, Rev. De. Gest. ão Coste Integr., 11, 65
  22. Morgado, 2022, Bottom-up evaluation of the uncertainty of the quantification of microplastics contamination in sediment samples, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 11080, 10.1021/acs.est.2c01828 · DOI
  23. Nava, 2023, Plastic debris in lakes and reservoirs, Nature, 619, 317, 10.1038/s41586-023-06168-4 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Nel, 2021, Detection limits are central to improve reporting standards when using Nile red for microplastic quantification, Chemosphere, 263, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127953 · DOI
  25. Pabortsava, 2020, High concentrations of plastic hidden beneath the surface of the Atlantic Ocean, Nat. Commun., 11, 4073, 10.1038/s41467-020-17932-9 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Parmar, 2023, Urban stormwater microplastic size distribution and impact of subsampling on polymer diversity, Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts, 25, 1374
  27. Primpke, 2020, Rapid identification and quantification of microplastics in the environment by quantum cascade laser-based hyperspectral infrared chemical imaging, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 15893, 10.1021/acs.est.0c05722 · DOI
  28. Primpke, 2020, Critical assessment of analytical methods for the harmonized and cost-efficient analysis of microplastics, Appl. Spectrosc., 74, 10.1177/0003702820921465 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Roscher, 2021, Microplastic pollution in the Weser estuary and the German North Sea, Environ. Pollut., 288, 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117681 · DOI
  30. Roscher, 2022, Microplastics in two German wastewater treatment plants: Year-long effluent analysis with FTIR and Py-GC/MS, Sci. Total Environ., 817, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152619 · DOI
  31. Thaysen, 2020, Towards Raman automation for microplastics: developing strategies for particle adhesion and filter subsampling, Appl. Spectrosc., 74, 976, 10.1177/0003702820922900 · DOI
  32. Vickerstaff, 2019, Methods to adjust for multiple comparisons in the analysis and sample size calculation of randomised controlled trials with multiple primary outcomes, BMC Med. Res. Method., 19, 129, 10.1186/s12874-019-0754-4 · DOI
  33. Waldschläger, 2022, Learning from natural sediments to tackle microplastics challenges: a multidisciplinary perspective, Earth-Sci. Rev., 228, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104021 · DOI
  34. Weber, 2023, Underestimating microplastics? Quantification of the recovery rate of microplastic particles including sampling, sample preparation, subsampling, and detection using µ-Ramanspectroscopy, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 415, 2963–2973, 10.1007/s00216-022-04447-z · DOI
  35. Werbowski, 2021, Urban Stormwater Runoff: A Major Pathway for Anthropogenic Particles, Black Rubbery Fragments, and Other Types of Microplastics to Urban Receiving Waters, ACS EST Water, 1, 1420, 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00017 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Cowger, W., Markley, L. A. T., Moore, S., Gray, A. B., Upadhyay, K., & Koelmans, A. A.
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
275
Pages
116243
ISSN
0147-6513
DOI
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116243
Cited by
51
References
5
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Syracuse University
  • National Science Foundation (1449617)
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory
  • NSF
  • USDA (CA-R-ENS-5120-H, CA-R-ENS-5189-RR)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.