The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trace elements in aquatic environment. Origin, distribution, assessment and toxicity effect for the aquatic biota
Abstract
Abstract Trace elements contamination and accumulation in bottom sediment represents a risk to environment and aquatic biota. Their anthropogenic or natural discharge, extension and cumulation can cause large scale of ecological destructions. Bioaccumulation and biomagnification is capable of leading to toxic level of these chemical substances in fish and other fresh water organisms (benthos, zooplankton), even when the exposure is low. The fish contamination through trophic structure can cause serious consequences to human health. The aim of the manuscript was to assemble and summarize the latest literature on the environmental and the aquatic biota effects of trace element contamination of bottom sediments. The article is also a review of new methods for trace elements elimination and their assessment to impact on aquatic organisms. Based on collected scientific publications in last 20 years the most common and important trace elements in aquatic ecosystem are Chromium, Arsenic, Mercury, Cadmium and Copper. These compounds are dangerous for living organisms and can disrupt their homeostasis as well as a cardiovascular, nervous and digestive system. Nowadays exist many instrumental methods, which are available to determine the trace element concentration such as PMF, INNA, BCR, XRF and bioassay. In searched studies the most preferred and used analyse of trace element concentration in aquatic bottom sediments is bioassay. This biological method is good complement to physical and chemical analyses in procedures of sediment quality assessment. Bioassay method can indicate sensitive response of planktonic organisms to various trace elements and provide information about the real risk to aquatic life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review
Nagajyoti, P. C., Lee, K. D., & Sreekanth, T. V. M. (2010) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8 · Cited by 3,962
Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Copper, Zinc, and Cadmium in Some Aquatic Organisms
Zyadah, M. A. (2000) · Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s001280000066 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Hassan, F., Jamil, F., Hussain, A., Ali, H. M., Janjua, M. M., Khushnood, S., Farhan, M., Altaf, K., Said, Z., & Li, C. (2022) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101646 · Cited by 283
Unraveling the ecological footprint of textile dyes: A growing environmental concern
Hoque, M. B., Oyshi, T. H., Hannan, M. A., Haque, P., Rahman, M. M., Shahid, M. A., & Sheikh, S. (2024) · Pollution Study · doi:10.54517/ps.v5i2.3014 · Cited by 43
Kirsch, G., Araujo, R. M. G., Melo, M. S., Nazari, E. M., & Figueiredo, B. R. S. (2025) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144756 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolarova, N., & Napiórkowski, P.
- Venue
- Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 655-668
- ISSN
- 1642-3593 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3135650275
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trace elements in aquatic environment. Origin, distribution, assessment and toxicity effect for the aquatic biota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2021.02.002
- The paper
- Kolarova, N., & Napiórkowski, P. (2021). Trace elements in aquatic environment. Origin, distribution, assessment and toxicity effect for the aquatic biota. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2021.02.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.