Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results

Muñoz-Piña, Carlos, Guevara, Alejandro, Torres, Juan Manuel, Braña, Josefina·2008·Ecological Economics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Alix-García, 2004, A Tale of Two Communities: Explaining Deforestation in Mexico, vol. 964
  2. Ávila, 2005, Decoupling the subsidy for water pumping, vol. 0502
  3. Bruijnzeel, 1989, Highland-Lowland Interactions in the Ganges Brahmaputra River Basin: A Review of Published Literature, vol. 11
  4. Carrillo-Rivera, 2002, Consideraciones Geohidrológicas de la Relación Bosques-Agua en la Región Sierra Gorda, vol. 0207
  5. Cason, 2004, Auction design for voluntary conservation programs, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 1211, 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00666.x · DOI
  6. Chomitz, 1998, The domestic benefits of tropical forest preservation: a critical review emphasizing hydrological functions, The World Bank Research Observer, 13, 13, 10.1093/wbro/13.1.13 · DOI
  7. Douglas, 2007, Policy Implications of a pan-tropic assessment of the simultaneous hydrological and biodiversity impacts of deforestation, Water Resources Management, 21, 211, 10.1007/s11269-006-9050-2 · doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9050-2
  8. García-Coll, 2002, Potencial de Recarga de Acuíferos y Estabilización de Ciclos Hídricos de Áreas Forestadas, vol. 0208
  9. Jaramillo, 2002, Estimación del Costo de Oportunidad del Uso de Suelo Forestal en Ejidos a Nivel Nacional, vol. 0205
  10. Latacz-Lohmann, 1997, Auctioning conservation contracts: a theoretical analysis and an application, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50, 187
  11. McCarthy, 2001, Common pool resource appropriation under costly cooperation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42, 297, 10.1006/jeem.2000.1164 · DOI
  12. Muñoz-Piña, 2003, Recrafting Rights over Common Property Resources in Mexico, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52, 1, 10.1086/380104 · doi:10.1086/380104
  13. Muñoz-Piña, 2004, Pixel patterns of deforestation in Mexico: 1993–2000, vol. 0401
  14. Stoneham, 2003, Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47, 477, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00224.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Velásquez, 2002, Patrones y tasas de cambio de uso del suelo en México, Gaceta Ecológica, 62, 21
  16. Wu, 2001, Environmental and distributional impacts of conservation targeting strategies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 333, 10.1006/jeem.2000.1146 · DOI

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
Muñoz-Piña, C., Guevara, A., Torres, J. M., & Braña, J.
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
725-736
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127683045
Cited by
574
References
0
FWCI
18.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
The paper
Muñoz-Piña, C., Guevara, A., Torres, J. M., & Braña, J. (2008). Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.