The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial
Abstract
The present paper proposes that markets for nature conservation on private land are missing because of the problem of asymmetric information. An auction of conservation contracts was designed to reveal hidden information needed to facilitate meaningful transactions between landholders and government. The present paper describes the key elements of auction and contract design employed and the results obtained from a pilot auction of conservation contracts run in two regions of Victoria. The pilot demonstrated that it was possible to create at least the supply side of a market for nature conservation and in conjunction with a defined budget, prices were discovered and resources allocated through contracts with landholders. The present paper compares a discriminative price auction with a hypothetical fixed‐price scheme showing that an auction could offer large cost savings to governments interested in nature conservation on private land. The paper identifies some important design problems that would need to be solved before auctions could be applied more broadly including: multiple complementary outcomes, reserve prices, sequential auction design and contract design. Nevertheless, the paper does show that auctioning conservation contracts for environmental outcomes is an important new policy mechanism that deserves closer examination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
Dugger, W. M. (1987) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.1987.11504638 · Cited by 14,786
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
(1986) · The Antitrust Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0003603x8603100308 · Cited by 10,730
COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS
Vickrey, W. (1961) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x · Cited by 7,722
Multitask principal – agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design
Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24 · Cited by 6,046
Myerson, R. B. (1981) · Mathematics of Operations Research · doi:10.1287/moor.6.1.58 · Cited by 5,920
Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-4796 · Cited by 3,795
A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms
Ouchi, W. G. (1979) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · Cited by 3,707
Williamson, O. E. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195078244.001.0001 · Cited by 3,041
Cited by
Integrating economic costs into conservation planning
NAIDOO, R., BALMFORD, A., FERRARO, P., POLASKY, S., RICKETTS, T., & ROUGET, M. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003 · Cited by 892
Pannell, D. J. (2008) · Land Economics · doi:10.3368/le.84.2.225 · Cited by 277
The Roles of Adoption and Behavior Change in Agricultural Policy
Pannell, D. J., & Claassen, R. (2020) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13009 · Cited by 123
Brown, H. L., Bos, D. G., Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., & RossRakesh, S. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.984017 · Cited by 88
Is Public Procurement Going Green? Experiences and Open Issues
Appolloni, A., D'Amato, A., & Cheng, W. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1970583 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., & Strappazzon, L.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-500
- ISSN
- 1364-985X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8489
- OpenAlex
- W2126030463
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 29.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00224.x
- The paper
- Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., & Strappazzon, L. (2003). Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00224.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.