The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Institutional dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems
Pharo, E., & Daily, G. C. (1998) · The Bryologist · doi:10.2307/3244191 · Cited by 5,261
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2006) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400831739 · Cited by 5,140
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm · Cited by 4,229
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Governing the commons — the evolution of institutions for collective action
Weede, E. (1992) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(92)90034-e · Cited by 3,919
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 · Cited by 2,466 · cited 2×
“ES can also be club goods, which means that they can be consumed by many individuals without affecting the consumption of the others, but whose consumption by non-members can be prevented (Engel et al., 2008).”
BackgroundWhat are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 · Cited by 2,143
(2002) · Cited by 1,223
Cited by
Re-framing the climate change debate in the livestock sector: mitigation and adaptation options
Rivera‐Ferre, M. G., López‐i‐Gelats, F., Howden, M., Smith, P., Morton, J. F., & Herrero, M. (2016) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.421 · Cited by 157
Blundo-Canto, G., Bax, V., Quintero, M., Cruz-Garcia, G. S., Groeneveld, R. A., & Perez-Marulanda, L. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.011 · Cited by 139
Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services
(2013) · Studies in Ecological Economics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Corbera, E., Soberanis, C. G., & Brown, K.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 743-761
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146492841
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Institutional dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008
- The paper
- Corbera, E., Soberanis, C. G., & Brown, K. (2009). Institutional dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
