The DOI matches its Crossref record.
China's sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Chen, 2006, Livelihood impacts of the conversion of cropland to forest and grassland program, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49, 555, 10.1080/09640560600747554 · doi:10.1080/09640560600747554
- Ferraro, 2008, “Asymmetric Information and Contract Design for Payments for Environmental Services", Ecological Economics, 65, 810, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, 2005, The retrospect and prospects of China's soil and water conservation and integrated small watershed management, China Water Resources, 19, 17
- Long, 2006, “Land use and soil erosion in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River: Some Socio-Economic Considerations on China's Grain-for-Green Programme.”, Lang Degradation & Development, 17, 589, 10.1002/ldr.736 · doi:10.1002/ldr.736
- Lu, 1998, Grain versus food: a hidden issue in China's food policy debate, World Development, 26, 1641, 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00078-3 · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00078-3
- Tao, 2004, Grain for green project, grain policy and sustainable development, Social Sciences in China, 150, 25
- Uchida, 2005, Grain for green: cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China's conservation set-aside program, Land Economics, 81, 247, 10.3368/le.81.2.247 · DOI · Paper page
- Uchida, 2007, “Are the Poor Benefiting from China's Land Conservation Program?", Environment and Development Economics, 12, 593, 10.1017/S1355770X07003713 · DOI · Paper page
- Weyerhaeuser, 2005, “Local impacts and responses to regional forest conservation and rehabilitation programs in China's Northwest Yunnan province.”, Agricultural Systems, 85
- Wong, 2000, “Central-local relations revisited: the 1994 Tax Sharing Reform and Public Expenditure Management in China.”, China Perspectives, 31, 52
- Xu, 2001, The socioeconomic impacts and sustainability of the SLCP. In: Xu, Jintao, Katsigris, Eugenia, White, Thomas A. (Eds.), Implementing the Natural Forest Protection Program and the Sloping Land Conversion Program: Lessons and Policy Recommendations
- Xu, Jintao, Tao, Ran, Xu, Zhigang, Bennett, Michael T, in press. “China's Sloping Land Conversion Program: Does Expansion Equal Success?” Mimeo.
- Xu, 2006, China's ecological rehabilitation: unprecedented efforts, dramatic impacts and requisite policies, Ecological Economics, 57, 595, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.008 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.008
- Xu, 2005, “Grain for green versus grain: conflict between food security and conservation set-aside in China.”, World Development, 34, 130, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Xu, 2004, China's sloping land conversion program four years on: current situation, pending issues, vol. 6(3-4), 317
- Yang, 1994, Cultivated land soil and water loss and control measures in China, Bullentin of Soil and Water Conservation, 14, 32
- Zhang, 2003, Temporal-spatial changes of cropland in China over the past 10 years based on remote sensing, Acta Geographica Sinica, 58, 323
- Zhang, 2006, “Investigating in Rural China: Tracking China's Commitment to Modernization.", Chinese Economy, 39, 57, 10.2753/CES1097-1475390404 · doi:10.2753/ces1097-1475390404
- Zuo, 2001, Part II. The sloping land conversion program (SLCP). Chapter 3. Implementation of the SLCP
Cited by
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 · Cited by 2,466
Smith, W. K., Nelson, E., Johnson, J. A., Polasky, S., Milder, J. C., Gerber, J. S., West, P. C., Siebert, S., Brauman, K. A., Carlson, K. M., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707812116 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, M. T.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 699-711
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973031794
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: China's sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.017
- The paper
- Bennett, M. T. (2008). China's sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
