Cited by 188Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and Development

Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement

Parikka-Alhola, Katriina·2008·Ecological Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 188

Authors
Parikka-Alhola, K.
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
68
Issue
1-2
Pages
472-485
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064848477
Cited by
188
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
22.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
green public procurement, furniture, eco-design, environmental labelling, most economically advantageous tender, furniture manufacturing company, Finland, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review