Cited by 48Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Accounting methods for international land-related leakage and distant deforestation drivers

Henders, Sabine, Ostwald, Madelene·2014·Ecological Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Civil society pressure to abandon unsustainable practices may lead buyers to change suppliers but not to address the core problem, creating leakage of unsustainable operations elsewhere.

    “In the case of leakage, civil society pressure to abandon unsustainable practices may for example lead buyers to change suppliers but not to address the core problem.This creates the so-called effect of leakage of unsustainable operations to be carried on somewhere else (Henders and Ostwald, 2014;Garrett et al., 2016;Gibbs et al., 2016;Alix-Garcia and Gibbs, 2017).”

    From Making deforestation risk visible. Discourses on bovine leather supply chain in Brazil (2020) · cites this paper as Henders and Ostwald, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henders, S., & Ostwald, M.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Henders, Sabine
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
99
Pages
21-28
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989049176
Cited by
48
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
land use change, deforestation, agricultural trade, teleconnections, REDD+, CO2 emissions, life cycle assessment, emission factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review