Cited by 53Economic and Environmental ValuationLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The complexity of biodiversity: a biological perspective on economic valuation

Open access
Farnsworth, K.D., Adenuga, A.H., de Groot, R.S.·2015·Ecological Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.003

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farnsworth, K. D., Adenuga, A. H., & de Groot, R. S.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Farnsworth, K.D.
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
120
Pages
350-354
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177137637
Cited by
53
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
biodiversity valuation, stated preference methods, naturalness, ecosystem services, indirect use value, cost valuation, biodiversity conservation planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review