Cited by 635Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning

Gamfeldt, Lars, Hillebrand, Helmut, Jonsson, Per R.·2008·Ecology

Abstract

Biodiversity is proposed to be important for the rate of ecosystem functions. Most biodiversity-ecosystem function studies, however, consider only one response variable at a time, and even when multiple variables are examined they are analyzed separately. This means that a very important aspect of biodiversity is overlooked: the possibility for different species to carry out different functions at any one time. We propose a conceptual model to explore the effects of species loss on overall ecosystem functioning, where overall functioning is defined as the joint effect of many ecosystem functions. We show that, due to multifunctional complementarity among species, overall functioning is more susceptible to species loss than are single functions. Modeled relationships between species richness and overall ecosystem functioning using five empirical data sets on monocultures reflected the range of effects of species loss on multiple functions predicted by the model. Furthermore, an exploration of the correlations across functions and the degree of redundancy within functions revealed that multifunctional redundancy was generally lower than single-function redundancy in these empirical data sets. We suggest that by shifting the focus to the variety of functions maintained by a diversity of species, the full importance of biodiversity for the functioning of ecosystems can be uncovered. Our results are thus important for conservation and management of biota and ecosystem services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/06-2091.1

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gamfeldt, L., Hillebrand, H., & Jonsson, P. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Gamfeldt, Lars
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
1223-1231
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2072801663
Cited by
635
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 18
FWCI
30.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Naturvårdsverket
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
biodiversity-ecosystem functioning, species extinction, species richness, ecosystem functioning, monoculture, functional redundancy, ecosystem services, conservation
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Models, Biological, Regression Analysis, Ecosystem, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Biodiversity, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review