Cited by 326Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Science and Environmental ManagementSoil Management and Crop Yield

Selecting biological indicators for monitoring soils: a framework for balancing scientific and technical opinion to assist policy development

Ritz, Karl, Black, Helaina I.J., Campbell, Colin D., Harris, Jim A., Wood, Claire·2009·Ecological Indicators

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.009

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The different requirements for an indicator were weighted: reproducibility was considered absolutely essential, whereas the existence of a standard protocol had the lowest weight.

    “The di ff erent requirements for an indicator (Table 3) were weighted: reproducibility was considered absolutely essential, whereas the existence of a standard protocol had the lowest weight.”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Ritz et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Swift, M.J., Bignell, D.E. 2001 Standard methods for the assessment of soil biodiversity and land-use practice.ASB-Lecture Note 6B International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, South East Asian Regional Research Programme, Bogor, Indonesia. pp. 323-333.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritz, K., Black, H. I. J., Campbell, C. D., Harris, J. A., & Wood, C.
Affiliations
Cranfield University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ritz, Karl
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
1212-1221
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143540699
Cited by
326
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 26
FWCI
30.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil bioindicators, soil quality monitoring, soil ecosystem services, soil organisms, soil policy, natural capital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review