Cited by 142Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Ecosystem services in grassland associated with biotic and abiotic soil parameters

Open access
van Eekeren, Nick, de Boer, Herman, Hanegraaf, Marjoleine, Bokhorst, Jan, Nierop, Dré, Bloem, Jaap, Schouten, Ton, de Goede, Ron +1 more·2010·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Biotic soil parameters have so far seldom played a role in practical soil assessment and management of grasslands. However, the ongoing reduction of external inputs in agriculture would imply an increasing reliance on ecosystem self-regulating processes. Since soil biota play an important role in these processes and in the provision of ecosystem services, biological soil parameters should be an integral part of soil assessment. The general objective of the current study is to investigate to what extent biotic soil parameters provide additional value in soil quality assessment of grassland on sandy soils. We measured abiotic and biotic soil parameters together with process parameters underlying ecosystem services in 20 permanent production grasslands. Cross-validated stepwise regression was used to identify abiotic and biotic soil parameters that explained the soil ecosystem services soil structure maintenance, water regulation, supply of nutrients, and grassland production, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.016

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Eekeren, N., de Boer, H., Hanegraaf, M., Bokhorst, J., Nierop, D., Bloem, J., Schouten, T., de Goede, R., & Brussaard, L.
Affiliations
  • Louis Bolk Instituut (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
1491-1504
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103743526
Cited by
142
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
ecosystem services, grassland soils, soil quality assessment, sandy soil, soil organic matter, soil nitrogen supply capacity, earthworms, Enchytraeidae, water regulation, nutrient supply, soil bulk density, penetration resistance, soil moisture, soil total nitrogen, soil carbon mineralization, grassland production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review