Cited by 115Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Science and Environmental Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Operationalizing ecosystem services for the mitigation of soil threats: A proposed framework

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.016

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 73 references

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schwilch, G., Bernet, L., Fleskens, L., Giannakis, E., Leventon, J., Marañón, T., Mills, J., Short, C., Stolte, J., van Delden, H., & Verzandvoort, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Cyprus Institute (CY)
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • University of Gloucestershire (GB)
  • Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Schwilch, Gudrun
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
67
Pages
586-597
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2344230106
Cited by
115
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
European Union Seventh Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
Keywords
ecosystem services, soil degradation, soil threats, soil remediation, land management, natural capital, stakeholder engagement, environmental policy, trade-offs, transdisciplinarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review