The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Operationalizing ecosystem services for the mitigation of soil threats: A proposed framework
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The distinction between inherent (static) and manageable (dynamic) attributes, however, is not absolute and also context-dependent (Schwilch et al., 2016).”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Schwilch et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The soil functions in Fig. 2 equate almost entirely to the ' intermediate services ' de fi ned by Bennett et al. (2010), which are similar to the soil processes presented by Schwilch et al. (2016).”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Schwilch et al. (2016)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES
Folke, C. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 · Cited by 7,749
Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems
Pharo, E. J., & Daily, G. C. (1998) · The Bryologist · doi:10.2307/3244191 · Cited by 5,299
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2009) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,706
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 · Cited by 3,390
Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment
Alcamo, J. (2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4645 · Cited by 2,846
Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units
de Groot, R. S., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N. D., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., et al. (2012) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 · Cited by 2,766
What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
Boyd, J. W., & Banzhaf, H. S. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 · Cited by 2,034
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960
Self-citationSoil microbiota as game-changers in restoration of degraded lands
Coban, O., Deyn, G. B. D., & van der Ploeg, M. J. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe0725 · Cited by 724
Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade
Potschin-Young, M., Haines-Young, R. H., Görg, C., Heink, U., Jax, K., & Schleyer, C. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.015 · Cited by 311
“…can be reconceptualised in the context of the ecosystem service paradigm, Brink et al. (2016) used a modified cascade to reflect on ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change in urban areas, and Schwilch et al. (2015) employed the cascade as a way to describe the mitigation of soil threats.”
BackgroundRemote sensing of soil degradation: Progress and perspective
Wang, J., Zhen, J., Hu, W., Chen, S., Lizaga, I., Zeraatpisheh, M., & Yang, X. (2023) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.03.002 · Cited by 353
Greiner, L., Keller, A., Grêt‐Regamey, A., & Papritz, A. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.025 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwilch, G., Bernet, L., Fleskens, L., Giannakis, E., Leventon, J., Marañón, T., Mills, J., Short, C., Stolte, J., van Delden, H., & Verzandvoort, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Cyprus Institute (CY)
- Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- University of Gloucestershire (GB)
- Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Schwilch, Gudrun
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecological Indicators
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 586-597
- ISSN
- 1470-160X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2344230106
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
- Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (acceptedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
- Funders
- European Union Seventh Framework Programme
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- ecosystem services, soil degradation, soil threats, soil remediation, land management, natural capital, stakeholder engagement, environmental policy, trade-offs, transdisciplinarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
