Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distinguishing the impacts of climate change and anthropogenic factors on vegetation dynamics in the Yangtze River Basin, China

Qu, Sai, Wang, Lunche, Lin, Aiwen, Yu, Deqing, Yuan, Moxi, Li, Chang'an·2020·Ecological Indicators

Abstract

Abstract Assessing and attributing vegetation dynamics can provide essential information for environmental resources management, particularly for those regions with fragile ecosystems. The Yangtze River Basin (YRB), a region of pivotal importance to the ecological balance and security of China, has experienced dramatic changes in environment and landscape driven by climate change and human activities, especially afforestation projects in recent years. Yet how the driving factors contribute quantitatively to vegetation dynamics is not well established. Here we investigate spatiotemporal variability of vegetation coverage in terms of the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) over 2001–2015, and analyze the actual influences of various climatic factors on EVI inter-annual variations. Further analysis quantifies the contributions of climate change and anthropogenic factors to EVI inter-annual variations. The results show that over the 15-year period, the average EVI demonstrated fluctuations but denoted a generally upward trend, with an increasing rate of 0.0027/a. According to the Hurst exponent analysis, areas with consistent improvement were primarily concentrated in Hunan Province and eastern Sichuan Province, where the main vegetation types are broadleaf forest and mixed forest. The average contributions of temperature, precipitation and solar radiation to EVI inter-annual variations in the YRB was 0.0041/a, 0.00012/a, and −0.0034/a, respectively. Temperature was the controlling climate factor, with the greatest contribution to EVI inter-annual variations, while solar radiation made strong negative contributions. The average contributions of climate change and anthropogenic factors to EVI inter-annual variations were 0.0008/a and 0.0019/a, accounting for 70.37% and 29.63% of the total EVI changes respectively. Human activities, especially ecological afforestation projects, were the main driving factors improving vegetation coverage in the YRB, and the spatial distribution of forest gains was consistent with the positive contribution of human activities to the EVI trend. However, urbanization has occupied the growth space of vegetation and was a negative human-induced factor affecting vegetation growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105724

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Metadata

Authors
Qu, S., Wang, L., Lin, A., Yu, D., Yuan, M., & Li, C.
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
108
Pages
105724
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973303088
Cited by
320
References
33
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinguishing the impacts of climate change and anthropogenic factors on vegetation dynamics in the Yangtze River Basin, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105724
The paper
Qu, S., Wang, L., Lin, A., Yu, D., Yuan, M., & Li, C. (2020). Distinguishing the impacts of climate change and anthropogenic factors on vegetation dynamics in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105724

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.