Cited by 2,779Remote Sensing in AgricultureLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Greening of the Earth and its drivers

Open access
Zhu, Zaichun, Piao, Shilong, Myneni, Ranga B., Huang, Mengtian, Zeng, Zhenzhong, Canadell, Josep G., Ciais, Philippe, Sitch, Stephen +24 more·2016·Nature Climate Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate3004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate change has contributed to degradation chiefly in regions around 15-45°S, although studies disagree regarding the exact region of impact.

    “Analyses of remotely sensed vegetation greenness (and vegetation browning) as well as model-based studies found that climate change has contributed to degradation chiefly in regions located around 15-45 o S, although studies disagree regarding the exact region of impact (36,60,61).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [60]

    The passage on regional climate effects (section labeled Abstract; no page given) says climatic effects are negative in some regions and that South America is the only continent where negative effects were statistically significant. It also reports inconsistency between models. It does not establish that degradation occurred chiefly at 15–45°S or that studies disagree about the exact region affected. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In many regions, leaf-area index and land ecosystem carbon uptake have increased over recent decades, partly due to the CO2 fertilization effect.

    “In many regions, for example, leaf-area index and land ecosystem carbon uptake have increased over recent decades, partly due to the CO 2 fertilization effect (60,62).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Abstract reports widespread increases in leaf-area index during 1982–2009 and attributes much of the greening trend to CO2 fertilization. It also describes a modeled increase in leaf-level carbon assimilation in response to rising CO2, but does not establish an increase in land-ecosystem carbon uptake over recent decades. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ciais, P. et al. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds T.F. Stocker et al.) Ch. 6, 465-570 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
  2. Ukkola, A. M. et al. Reduced streamflow in water-stressed climates consistent with CO2 effects on vegetation. Nature Clim. Change advance online publication, doi:10.1038/nclimate2831(2015). · DOI
  3. Norby, R. J. et al. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad Post-print of: Zhu, Zaichun, et al. "Greeing of the Earth and its drivers" in Nature climate change. Published online 25th April 2016. Sent to Nature Publishing. Final version available in DOI 10.1038/nclimate3004 A c c e p t e d m a n u s c r i p t range of productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18052-18056 (2005).
  4. Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 436-441 (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Z., Piao, S., Myneni, R. B., Huang, M., Zeng, Z., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Sitch, S., Friedlingstein, P., Arneth, A., Cao, C., Cheng, L., Kato, E., Koven, C., Li, Y., Lian, X., Liu, Y., Liu, R., Mao, J., Pan, Y., Peng, S., Peñuelas, J., Poulter, B., Pugh, T. A. M., Stocker, B. D., Viovy, N., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Xiao, Z., Yang, H., Zaehle, S., & Zeng, N.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Institute of Applied Energy (JP)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Montana State University (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Piao, Shilong
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2016-04-25
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
791-795
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2336426693
Cited by
2,779
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 360 · 2025: 342 · 2024: 342 · 2023: 353 · 2022: 350 · 2021: 320 · 2020: 231 · 2019: 199 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 26
FWCI
139.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE--AC05--00OR22725, DE-AC05?, 00OR22725)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC05-00OR22725)
  • Battelle (DE-AC05- 00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC05)
  • European Commission (282672, 603542)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2013CB956303, 111 Project, DE-AC05-00OR22725, 41530528, B14001)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB03030404)
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (B14001)
  • Office of Science (DEAC05- 00OR22725, -610028, AC05-00OR22725)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2013CB956303)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (00OR22725, DE‐AC05–00OR22725)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC05-00OR22725)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
global greening, vegetation browning, CO2 fertilization, nitrogen deposition, climate change impacts on vegetation, land cover change, ecosystem services, phosphorus limitation, Tibetan Plateau, tropical vegetation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review